MHB Marcus 's question at Yahoo Answers (Bijectivity on finite and infinite sets)

AI Thread Summary
For a finite set A, if the composition of two functions f and g is a bijection, then both f and g must also be bijections. This is demonstrated through the injectivity of g leading to its bijectivity, and subsequently showing that f is also bijective. In contrast, for an infinite set A, such as the integers, it is possible for f and g to compose into a bijection while neither function is bijective individually. An example provided illustrates this with specific functions f and g, where their composition results in the identity function, confirming the distinction between finite and infinite cases. The discussion emphasizes the critical difference in behavior of bijections in finite versus infinite sets.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Supposed that A is a finite set, f: A --> A and g: A --> A. Supposed in addition that f o g: A --> A is a bijection. Prove that f and g are both bijections.
Give an explicit example to show that the conclusions of the previous problem is false if A is an infinite set. In other words, if A is an infinite set, f: A --> A and g: A --> A are functions and f o g: A --> A is a bijection it is not necessarily the case that f and g are both bijections.

Here is a link to the question:

Abstract math question: bijectivity on finite and infinite sets? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Marcus,

For a finite set $A$, any map $h:A\to A$ is injective iff it is surjective iff it is bijective. Suppose $f\circ g$ is a bijecion. Let us see that $g$ is injective $$g(x)=g(y)\Rightarrow f[g(x)]=f[g(y)]=(f\circ g)(x)=(f\circ g)(y)\Rightarrow x=y$$ That is, $g$ is injective which implies ($A$ finite) that $g$ is a bijection. Now, $$f=f\circ (g\circ g^{-1})=(f\circ g)\circ g^{-1}$$ and the composition of bijections is a bijection.

For $A$ infinite, consider $A=\mathbb{Z}$, and let

$$f:A\to A\;,\quad f(x)=\left\lfloor\frac{x}{2}\right\rfloor\\g:A\to A,\;\quad g(x)=2x$$ Then, $$(f\circ g)(x)=f(2x)=\left\lfloor\frac{2x}{2}\right\rfloor=x$$ is the identity, so $f\circ g$ is a bijection, but $f$ is not injective, for example $f(0)=f(1)=0$.

If you have further questions, you can post them in the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f15/ section.
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top