MHB Martin's question at Yahoo Answers regarding using the washer and shell methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shell
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of the solid formed by revolving the region T, enclosed by the curves y=x^2 and y=x^3, around the Y-axis using both the washer and shell methods. The intersection points of the curves are determined to be (0,0) and (1,1). Using the washer method, the volume is calculated as V=π/10. The shell method also yields the same volume of V=π/10. Both methods confirm the consistency of the results for the volume of the solid of revolution.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus volume help please?

Let T be the region enclosed between the graphs of y=x^2 and y=x^3

A. Use the washer method to find the volume of the solid of revolution formed when T is revolved about the Y-axis.

B. Use the shell method to compute the volume of the solid of revolution described in Part A.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello martin,

First, let's determine the coordinates of the intersections of the given curves. Equating them we find:

$$x^3=x^2$$

$$x^3-x^2=0$$

$$x^2(x-1)=0$$

Thus, we find the two points are $(0,0)$ and $(1,1)$. Here is a diagram of the region $T$:

View attachment 1933

a) Use the washer method to find the volume of the solid of revolution formed when $T$ is revolved about the $y$-axis.

The volume of an arbitrary washer is:

$$dV=\pi\left(R^2-r^2 \right)\,dy$$

where:

$$R=y^{\frac{1}{3}}$$

$$r=y^{\frac{1}{2}}$$

And so we have:

$$dV=\pi\left(y^{\frac{2}{3}}-y \right)\,dy$$

Summing up all the washers, there results:

$$V=\pi\int_0^1 y^{\frac{2}{3}}-y\,dy$$

Applying the FTOC, we get:

$$V=\pi\left[\frac{3}{5}y^{\frac{5}{3}}-\frac{1}{2}y^2 \right]_0^1=\pi\left(\frac{3}{5}-\frac{1}{2} \right)=\frac{\pi}{10}$$

b) Use the shell method to compute the volume of the solid of revolution described in part a).

The volume of an arbitrary shell is:

$$dV=2\pi rh\,dx$$

where:

$$r=x$$

$$h=x^2-x^3$$

And so we have:

$$dV=2\pi\left(x^3-x^4 \right)\,dx$$

Summing up all of the shells, there results:

$$V=2\pi\int_0^1 x^3-x^4\,dx$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain:

$$V=2\pi\left[\frac{1}{4}x^3-\frac{1}{5}x^5 \right]_0^1=2\pi\left(\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{5} \right)=\frac{\pi}{10}$$
 

Attachments

  • martin.jpg
    martin.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 95
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top