Mass Attenuation coefficient greater than 1

In summary: PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/ComTab/water.htmlIn summary, the mass Attenuation coefficient for water at 10 keV is 5.2 cm^2/g, which translates to 5200 cm^2/kg or 0.052 cm^2/mg or 0.0052 m^2/g. This value is greater than 1, which may seem counterintuitive since it represents the probability of interaction per gram of water. However, this is not a problem as there is nothing special about the value of 1 and it simply depends on the chosen units. The value of 5.2 also corresponds to a mu/rho value of
  • #1
superduke1200
57
1
Hello everyone,

I don't seem to understand why mass Attenuation coefficient is greater than 1 at low energies where photoelectric effect is dominant.

5.2 cm^2 /g at water for 10 kev incident photons.

Since it is the probability to interact per g of water how can it be greater than 1?

I woukd really appreciate your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
5.2 cm^2/g = 5200 cm^2/kg = 0.052 cm^2/mg = 0.0052 m^2/g

There is nothing special about 1, and the numerical value depends on the units you choose. A larger value just means it is absorbed more.
 
  • #3
What is the problem ?
Mu/rho=5.2 so mu=5.2 /cm for water
So 1 cm of water it comes an attenuation of exp (-5.2) not illogical for 10 kev in waer
PSR
 
  • #4
PSRB191921 said:
What is the problem ?
Mu/rho=5.2 so mu=5.2 /cm for water
So 1 cm of water it comes an attenuation of exp (-5.2) not illogical for 10 kev in waer
PSR
I think I am getting it.

Exp(-5.2)=0,0055 which means that out of 10.000 incident photons only 55 of them would make it through 1 cm of water without interacting at all.

All the others will remain in the water and produce mainly electrons since the photoelectric effect is dominant?
 
  • #5
Or to be correct: all the remaining 9945 photons will produce photoelctrons.

Since the average Etr=9,25 Kev we will 9945 photoelctrons with a mean kinetic energy of 9,25 kev
 
  • #6
superduke1200 said:
Or to be correct: all the remaining 9945 photons will produce photoelctrons.
Technically some of them can interact with nuclei and some can do Compton scattering but these processes are very unlikely at 10 keV.

Where does the 9.25 keV come from?
 
  • #7
9.25 comes from this appendix
IMG_20180217_122234.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180217_122234.jpg
    IMG_20180217_122234.jpg
    35.3 KB · Views: 521

FAQ: Mass Attenuation coefficient greater than 1

1. What is the definition of mass attenuation coefficient greater than 1?

The mass attenuation coefficient is a measure of how much a material attenuates or reduces the intensity of a beam of X-rays or gamma rays as it passes through. When the value is greater than 1, it means that the material is particularly effective at reducing the intensity of the beam.

2. What factors affect the mass attenuation coefficient?

The mass attenuation coefficient is affected by several factors including the composition and density of the material, the energy of the X-rays or gamma rays, and the thickness of the material.

3. How is the mass attenuation coefficient calculated?

The mass attenuation coefficient is calculated by dividing the linear attenuation coefficient (a measure of how much a material absorbs radiation) by the density of the material.

4. Why is it important to have a mass attenuation coefficient greater than 1?

A high mass attenuation coefficient means that a material is effective at absorbing and reducing the intensity of X-rays or gamma rays. This is important in fields such as medical imaging and radiation shielding, where precise control of radiation exposure is necessary.

5. How does the mass attenuation coefficient vary for different materials?

The mass attenuation coefficient can vary significantly between different materials, as it is dependent on factors such as composition and density. For example, materials with a high atomic number (such as lead) will have a higher mass attenuation coefficient compared to materials with a lower atomic number (such as water).

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
353
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top