MHB Master Algebraic Fractions: Step-by-Step Guide with 3+ Sum Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter fordy2707
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractions
AI Thread Summary
To solve the expression -6/(s+3) - 4/(s+2) + 3/(s+1) + 2, the first step is to determine the lowest common denominator (LCD), which is the product of the distinct denominators. Each term must be adjusted to have this common denominator by multiplying by the appropriate factors. After adjusting, the expression can be combined into a single rational expression with a common denominator of (s+3)(s+2)(s+1). The final step involves expanding the numerator and combining like terms to simplify the expression. This method mirrors the process of adding fractions, making it manageable for those familiar with algebraic operations.
fordy2707
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hi all thanks for any help ,Can You solve:

View attachment 5445

I have the answer in my book but I don't know how the answer is reached

please show steps to solve, i can solve 2 sum fractions but not sure where to start with 3 or more sums involved
 

Attachments

  • FullSizeRender.jpg
    FullSizeRender.jpg
    49.4 KB · Views: 107
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We are given the expression:

$$-\frac{6}{s+3}-\frac{4}{s+2}+\frac{3}{s+1}+2$$

And instructed to rewrite this expression as a single rational expression. Before we can do this, we need to determine the lowest common denominator (LCD), and since all denominators are prime with respect to each other, this will simply be the product of them all.

To make each term have this LCD, we need to take the LCD, and divide by denominator each term already has, and then multiply each term by 1 in the form of this quotient divided by itself. For example, the first term already has a denominator of $s+3$, and so we find the quotient:

$$\frac{(s+3)(s+2)(s+1)}{s+3}=(s+2)(s+1)$$

And so we will want to multiply the first term by:

$$1=\frac{(s+2)(s+1)}{(s+2)(s+1)}$$

I am emphasizing that this expression is equal to 1 so that it is clear that in doing so we are not changing the value of that term. Doing the same for the other terms, we will have:

$$-\frac{6}{s+3}\cdot\frac{(s+2)(s+1)}{(s+2)(s+1)}-\frac{4}{s+2}\cdot\frac{(s+3)(s+1)}{(s+3)(s+1)}+\frac{3}{s+1}\cdot\frac{(s+3)(s+2)}{(s+3)(s+2)}+2\cdot\frac{(s+3)(s+2)(s+1)}{(s+3)(s+2)(s+1)}$$

Now, all 4 terms have the same denominator, and we can combine them:

$$\frac{-6(s+2)(s+1)-4(s+3)(s+1)+3(s+3)(s+2)+2(s+3)(s+2)(s+1)}{(s+3)(s+2)(s+1)}$$

And so now we have done as instructed. You may wish to expand and then combine like terms in the numerator. :)
 
Nice one with your help I've worked it out, it's a long calculation to get the simplest form with no brackets but a good challenge
 
All we're doing here is repeating a/b + c/d = (ad + bc)/bd. If you're used to doing this, this should be easy.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top