MHB Math Behind Why a Box Tips Over When x > b/2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drain Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Tips
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mathematical reasoning behind why a box tips over when the distance x of the normal force from the center line exceeds b/2. It is established that when the sum of moments about the point of application of the normal force is zero, the box remains stable. Specifically, the equation W(b/2) = Ph indicates that for x ≤ b/2, the box will not tip over. However, as x increases beyond b/2, the box becomes increasingly prone to tipping, as the weight shifts the balance. The analysis concludes that if the total moment with respect to the normal force is non-negative, the box will not tip.
Drain Brain
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
I just want to know the correct mathematical workings of why the box will tip over when distance x of the normal force from the center line is b/2.

what I know is when $\sum M$ about the point of application of the normal force is zero, the box will not tip over.

so, mathematically $W\frac{b}{2}=Ph$

it means that when $x\le\frac{b}{2}$ the box will not tip over. is that correct?

What if the point of application of the normal force is at the center line (i.e x=0)? and What if $x>\frac{b}{2}$?
can you show me mathematically what will happen? Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • friction.jpg
    friction.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 88
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Drain Brain said:
it means that when $x\le\frac{b}{2}$ the box will not tip over. is that correct?

It's the other way around. The smaller $x$ is, the easier will the box tip over.
That's because the weight is responsible for keeping it in balance, tilting the box back to the left.
What if the point of application of the normal force is at the center line (i.e x=0)? and What if $x>\frac{b}{2}$?
can you show me mathematically what will happen? Thanks!

The sum of the moments with respect to the point where the normal force is applied is:
$$M_{\text{total with respect to N}} = \sum M_{\text{with respect to N}} = -W\cdot x + P \cdot h$$
That is assuming the we consider counter clockwise a positive rotation.

If $M_{\text{total with respect to N}} \ge 0$ the box will not tip over since it will want to rotate to the left.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top