Mathematical Induction question

In summary: Can you see that $\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {a_k } = a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_{n + 1} = \left( {a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n } \right) + a_{n + 1} ~?$In summary, the mathematician is trying to prove by mathematical induction that if A1, A2, ..., An and B are any n + 1 sets, then:Base step = n = 1 so P(1): A1 ∩ B = A1 ∩ BInduction Step
  • #1
William1
4
0
A question I'm working on and my math book doesn't clarify the answer well enough for me to follow. I'm having some issues at getting the math symbols to work correctly so bare with me!Prove by mathematical induction that if A1, A2, ..., An and B are any n + 1 sets, then:
View attachment 37
Base step = n = 1 so P(1): A1 ∩ B = A1 ∩ B
Induction Step: LHS of P(k+1):

Substitute (k+1) for all N. Working LHS: (where {k U i = 1}Ai is the union from 1 to n of Ak)
=(({k U i = 1}Ai​) U Ak+1) ∩ B; then distribute:
=(({k U i = 1}(Ai​ ∩ B) U ( Ak+1 ∩ B)

then this is where I get stuck. I feel there is about one or two more steps but I can't seem to grasp it. Any suggestions?
 

Attachments

  • question.png
    question.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 67
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
William said:
Prove by mathematical induction that if A1, A2, ..., An and B are any n + 1 sets, then:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/37
$\bigcup\limits_{k = 1}^{N + 1} {\left( {A_k \cap B} \right)} = \bigcup\limits_{k = 1}^N {\left( {A_k \cap B} \right)} \cup \left( {A_{N + 1} \cap B} \right)$
$ = \left[ {\left( {\bigcup\limits_{k = 1}^{N } { {A_k }} } \right) \cap B} \right] \cup \left( {A_{N+1 } \cap B} \right)$
$ = \left[ {\left( {\bigcup\limits_{k = 1}^{N } { {A_k } } } \right) \cup A_{N+1 } } \right] \cap B$.

Can you finish?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Wouldn't it just be:

= {k+1 U i = 1 Ai U Ak+1) ∩ B
= {k+1 U i = 1} (Ai ∩ B)
 
  • #4
William said:
Wouldn't it just be:
= {k+1 U i = 1 Ai U Ak+1) ∩ B
= {k+1 U i = 1} (Ai ∩ B)
Do you see that $\left( {\bigcup\limits_{k = 1}^N {A_k } } \right) \cup A_{N + 1} = \bigcup\limits_{k = 1}^{N + 1} {A_k } ~?$

I started with $P(N)$ being true.
Then looked at the expansion of $P(N+1)$.
 
  • #5
Yes, I sort of see how they are equal. It's still not crystal clear to me yet though.
 
  • #6
William said:
Yes, I sort of see how they are equal. It's still not crystal clear to me yet though.
Can you see that $\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {a_k } = a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_{n + 1} = \left( {a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n } \right) + a_{n + 1} ~?$

If so $\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {a_k } =\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{n} {a_k }+ a_{n + 1} $
 
  • #7
Yes, I see that.
 
  • #8
William said:
Yes, I see that.
Then what are you missing in understanding the induction proof?
 

FAQ: Mathematical Induction question

What is mathematical induction?

Mathematical induction is a technique used to prove statements or properties about an infinite set of numbers or objects. It involves proving that a statement holds for a base case, and then showing that if the statement holds for a particular value, it also holds for the next value. This process is repeated until the statement is proven to hold for all values in the set.

How is mathematical induction different from other proof techniques?

Mathematical induction is specifically used for proving statements about infinite sets, while other proof techniques may be used for finite sets. It also relies on the concept of a base case, which is not necessary in other proof techniques.

What is the role of the inductive hypothesis in mathematical induction?

The inductive hypothesis is an assumption that the statement holds for a particular value. It is used as a starting point to prove that the statement holds for the next value in the set. Without the inductive hypothesis, the proof would not be able to progress to the next step.

Can mathematical induction be used to prove all statements?

No, mathematical induction can only be used to prove statements that hold for all values in a set. If a statement is not true for all values, then mathematical induction cannot be used to prove it.

What are some common mistakes made when using mathematical induction?

Common mistakes when using mathematical induction include not properly defining the base case, not correctly using the inductive hypothesis, and incorrectly assuming that a statement holds for all values without actually proving it for each value. It is important to carefully follow the steps of mathematical induction to avoid these mistakes.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top