Matrix Proofs Homework: Q1 & Q2

In summary: Both terms have a common factor on the right, namely ##(I + BA^{-1})^{-1}##:$$I(I+BA^{-1})^{-1} + BA^{-1}(I+BA^{-1})^{-1}$$You can verify this by showing that $$(I+BA^{-1})^{-1} = (I+BA^{-1})^{-1}$$
  • #1
colt
22
0

Homework Statement



First Question: Be A and B square matrix. Show that if A and B are invertible matrix, then: (A + B)^(-1) = A^(-1) * [I + B*A^(-1)]^(-1)

The Attempt at a Solution



First Queston: (A+B)^(-1) = [A^(-1) + A^(-1)*B*A^(-1)]^(-1) (I distributed the a^(-1) outside the []). Then I don't know what else I can do

Homework Statement



Second Question: Be A and P matrix of nxn dimension with P being invertible. So det (P^(-1)*A*P) = det(A)

The Attempt at a Solution



I would like to transform the (P^(-1)*A*P) into (I*A), but since matrix multiplication ain't commutative, I don't know how to get there
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
colt said:
First Queston: (A+B)^(-1) = [A^(-1) + A^(-1)*B*A^(-1)]^(-1) (I distributed the a^(-1) outside the []). Then I don't know what else I can do
You can verify this by showing that
$$(A+B)(A^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1}) = I$$
Second Question: Be A and P matrix of nxn dimension with P being invertible. So det (P^(-1)*A*P) = det(A)
What properties of determinants do you know about?
 
  • #3
I was only able to develop it until here:

[itex]A(A^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1}) + B(A^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1}) =[/itex]

[itex]AA^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-}) + BA^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} = [/itex]

[itex]I[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} + BA^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} = [/itex]

[itex][I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} + B[A^{-1} + A^{-1}BA^{-1}]^{-1} = [/itex]

What properties of determinants do you know about?

I know that de determinant of A^(-1) = 1/ det A, that det A = det A transpose, that the det A with a constant K that multiplies one of its lines is equal to K that multiplies det A and so that if this constant multiplies all lines. then det A = K^n * det A
 
  • #4
colt said:
I was only able to develop it until here:

[itex]A(A^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1}) + B(A^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1}) =[/itex]

[itex]AA^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-}) + BA^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} = [/itex]

[itex]I[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} + BA^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} = [/itex]

[itex][I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} + B[A^{-1} + A^{-1}BA^{-1}]^{-1} = [/itex]
I know that de determinant of A^(-1) = 1/ det A, that det A = det A transpose, that the det A with a constant K that multiplies one of its lines is equal to K that multiplies det A and so that if this constant multiplies all lines. then det A = K^n * det A

I think the problem is asking you to assume that the wrong things are invertible. A and B invertible doesn't show A+B is invertible. You need to assume that everything is invertible. Then for the first use that C^(-1)D^(-1)=(DC)^(-1). Figure out what to put D and C equal to.
 
  • #5
colt said:
I was only able to develop it until here:

[itex]A(A^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1}) + B(A^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1}) =[/itex]

[itex]AA^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-}) + BA^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} = [/itex]

[itex]I[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} + BA^{-1}[I + BA^{-1}]^{-1} = [/itex]
Now try using the distributive property.
 
  • #6
colt said:
I know that de determinant of A^(-1) = 1/ det A, that det A = det A transpose, that the det A with a constant K that multiplies one of its lines is equal to K that multiplies det A and so that if this constant multiplies all lines. then det A = K^n * det A
Another important property: ##\det(AB) = \det(A)\det(B)##. Do you know this one? If so, the second problem should be easy.
 
  • #7
jbunniii said:
Now try using the distributive property.

How? The identity is irrelevant, so only the [itex]a^{-1}[/itex] is left, and I already distributed it without seeing any meaningful result


Another important property:[itex] det(AB)=det(A)det(B).[/itex] Do you know this one? If so, the second problem should be easy.

Ah yes, had forgotten this one.

I think the problem is asking you to assume that the wrong things are invertible. A and B invertible doesn't show A+B is invertible. You need to assume that everything is invertible. Then for the first use that C^(-1)D^(-1)=(DC)^(-1). Figure out what to put D and C equal to.

Didn't really understand. Can you try to explain it once more?
 
  • #8
colt said:
Didn't really understand. Can you try to explain it once more?

What I mean is take the inverse of both sides of (A + B)^(-1) = A^(-1) * [I + B*A^(-1)]^(-1). What you first did, distributing the A^(-1) inside of the [] is quite wrong. There's a ^(-1) on the bracket.
 
  • #9
jbunniii said:
now try using the distributive property.

colt said:
how? The identity is irrelevant, so only the [itex]a^{-1}[/itex] is left, and i already distributed it without seeing any meaningful result

Both terms have a common factor on the right, namely ##(I + BA^{-1})^{-1}##:

$$I(I+BA^{-1})^{-1} + BA^{-1}(I+BA^{-1})^{-1}$$

So factor out that common term and see what you get.
 
  • #10
Dick said:
What you first did, distributing the A^(-1) inside of the [] is quite wrong. There's a ^(-1) on the bracket.

Yes, I have to admit that I was suspicious about this distributive. Thanks for pointing it out.

Both terms have a common factor on the right, namely (I+BA−1)−1:

[itex]I(I+BA−1)−1+BA−1(I+BA−1)−1[/itex]


So factor out that common term and see what you get.

I see it now. Thanks
 

FAQ: Matrix Proofs Homework: Q1 & Q2

What is a matrix proof?

A matrix proof is a type of mathematical proof that involves using matrices and their properties to show that a given statement or theorem is true. It is often used in linear algebra and other areas of mathematics that involve matrices.

How do I approach a matrix proof?

The first step in approaching a matrix proof is to carefully read and understand the statement or theorem you are trying to prove. Then, try to apply known properties and operations of matrices to manipulate the given expressions and equations until you arrive at the desired conclusion. It is important to clearly explain each step and justify your reasoning in the proof.

What are the common mistakes to avoid in matrix proofs?

One common mistake to avoid in matrix proofs is assuming that properties of real numbers also apply to matrices. Matrices have their own unique properties and operations, so it is important to only use valid matrix operations in your proof. Another mistake is not showing all the necessary steps in your proof or not providing enough justification for your reasoning.

Can I use a calculator for matrix proofs?

In most cases, it is not recommended to use a calculator for matrix proofs. These proofs are meant to test your understanding of matrix properties and operations, so using a calculator may hinder your ability to demonstrate this understanding. However, in some cases, a calculator may be allowed or even necessary for complex calculations.

Are there any tips for solving matrix proofs?

One helpful tip for solving matrix proofs is to simplify the given expressions or equations as much as possible before starting the proof. This can make it easier to see which properties and operations can be applied. It is also important to carefully check each step and ensure that it follows logically from the previous one. Additionally, practicing regularly and familiarizing yourself with common matrix properties and operations can improve your ability to solve matrix proofs.

Similar threads

Back
Top