I Matrix representation for closed-form expression for Fibonacci numbers

murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
TL;DR Summary
Matrix representation for closed-form expression for Fibonacci numbers:
From the wikipedia page for Fibonacci numbers, I got that the matrix representation for closed-form expression for Fibonacci numbers is:

\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} ^ n =<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> F_{n+1} &amp; F_n \\<br /> F_n &amp; F_{n-1}\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}

That only works when F_0 = 0 and F_1 = 1. How can I find the matrix representation for arbitrary starting values, for example, when F_0 = a and F_1 = b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
murshid_islam said:
Summary:: Matrix representation for closed-form expression for Fibonacci numbers:

From the wikipedia page for Fibonacci numbers, I got that the matrix representation for closed-form expression for Fibonacci numbers is:

\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} ^ n =<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> F_{n+1} &amp; F_n \\<br /> F_n &amp; F_{n-1}\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}

That only works when F_0 = 0 and F_1 = 1. How can I find the matrix representation for arbitrary starting values, for example, when F_0 = a and F_1 = b?
Start with
\begin{pmatrix}<br /> a+b &amp; b \\<br /> b &amp; a\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} =<br /> <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> F_2 &amp; F_1 \\<br /> F_1 &amp; F_0\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

Then multiply repeatedly on the left by
\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} <br />
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and murshid_islam
Though same as post #2,
2022-05-10 14.01.44.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes martinbn and murshid_islam
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top