A Matrix representation of a unitary operator, change of basis

Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
If ##U## is an unitary operator written as the bra ket of two complete basis vectors :##U=\sum_{k}\left|b^{(k)}\right\rangle\left\langle a^{(k)}\right|##

##U^\dagger=\sum_{k}\left|a^{(k)}\right\rangle\left\langle b^{(k)}\right|##

And we've a general vector ##|\alpha\rangle## such that ##|\alpha\rangle=\sum_{a^{\prime}}\left|a^{\prime}\right\rangle\left\langle a^{\prime} \mid \alpha\right\rangle##

Sakurai writes at pg 50 :
"how can we obtain ##\left\langle b^{\prime} \mid \alpha\right\rangle##, the expansion coefficients in the new basis? answer is very simple: Just multiply (1.5.9) by ##\left\langle b^{(k)}\right|##
##
\left\langle b^{(k)} \mid \alpha\right\rangle=\sum_{l}\left\langle b^{(k)} \mid a^{(l)}\right\rangle\left\langle a^{(l)} \mid \alpha\right\rangle=\sum_{l}\left\langle a^{(k)}\left|U^{\dagger}\right| a^{(l)}\right\rangle\left\langle a^{(l)} \mid \alpha\right\rangle .
##
##(1.5 .1##
In matrix notation, (1.5.10) states that the column matrix for ##|\alpha\rangle## in the new basis can be obtained just by applying the square matrix ##U^{\dagger}## to the colum matrix in the old basis:
##\quad(\mathrm{New})=\left(U^{\dagger}\right)(##old ##)##"So if the matrix representing ##U^\dagger## is applied on to the matrix representing ##|\alpha\rangle## ,it gives the vectors representation in the new basis. But when I apply ##U^\dagger## onto say an basis vector ##\left|a_{1}\right\rangle## ,it doesn't give me the vectors representation in new basis as shown below :

##\begin{aligned} U^{\dagger}\left|a_{1}\right\rangle &=\sum_{k}\left|a^{k}\right\rangle\left\langle b^{k} \mid a_{1}\right\rangle \\ &=\sum_{k}\left(\left\langle b^{k} \mid a_{1}\right\rangle\right) \cdot\left|a^{k}\right\rangle \end{aligned}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why should it? You rather have
$$\ket{b^k}=\hat{U} \ket{a^k}.$$
Sakurai in the quoted text uses the adjoint of this
$$\bra{b^k}=\bra{a^k} \hat{U}^{\dagger}.$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top