Matter Alignment: Magnatism Effects on Salt Water Flow

In summary: It's a very weak diamagnetic material, meaning it's slightly repelled by magnetic fields, but not enough to have a noticeable effect. Antiferromagnetism is a property of certain solids, not liquids. So, in summary, water is not affected by magnetic fields in a way that would align or disperse its molecules, and there is no known way to manipulate the molecules in a liquid state to make it easier to move through.
  • #36
i knew that. its all some crazy theory if a gravity drivin device could ever happen. its just that train has always had me wondering the magnetic one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Tinman said:
its just that train has always had me wondering the magnetic one.
If you're referring to "mag-lev", it has absolutely nothing to do with what you are suggesting.
 
  • #38
Mag Lev it is . however i didnt place the two in the same category .But 28 years ago a picture of a magnetic train won me an art award befor maglev was made and was wonder woth all the brains in the world why they haven't gone further with the aplication of electromagnetic fields .dont atoms and some molecule for a fleeting moment give off a faint magnetic pulse/field regardles of its material
 
  • #39
Tinman said:
Mag Lev it is . however i didnt place the two in the same category .But 28 years ago a picture of a magnetic train won me an art award befor maglev was made and was wonder woth all the brains in the world why they haven't gone further with the aplication of electromagnetic fields

Because there are limitations to what we can do with these fields based on the laws of physics and the cost/complexity of the device.

.dont atoms and some molecule for a fleeting moment give off a faint magnetic pulse/field regardles of its material

Both atoms and molecules have a magnetic field associated with the intrinsic spin of their component particles and the orbital momentum of their electrons, but they don't emit "magnetic pulses".
 
  • #40
And you can't use its own field against itself what about the.first layer of water how its more idk how you say dence ? Or positivly charged and how some water molecules are memory shapes an advantage surely can be taken.there?
 
  • #41
Tinman, I'm afraid we're probably going to spend more time correcting your misunderstandings of physics that discussing the question. I highly suggest getting a good grasp on the basics of electromagnetism and chemistry. That in itself would probably answer many of your questions.
 
  • #42
Your defiantly rite but standard physics don't apply to.magnetic fields.do they or electricity didn't Tesla proof that and yes current limitation are what they are but my sugjesting to harness an atoms power other than tearing it apart isn't that bad really
 
  • #43
Tinman said:
my sugjesting to harness an atoms power other than tearing it apart isn't that bad really
Yes, it is.
 
  • #44
Danger said:
Yes, it is.
(Phys.org)—Researchers from the University of Leipzig have found that doping very small flakes of graphite with water, then allowing it to dry, results in a material that behaves very much like a superconductor. The team, led by Pablo Esquinazi have written a paper describing their process and results and have had it published in the peer review journalAdvanced Materials. If their findings prove sound, the discovery would almost certainly revolutionize the electronics industry.A superconductor is a material that conducts electricity without resistance, which means no loss of energy; researchers have been searching for such a material that operates atroom temperature (many materials aresuperconductors at very cold temperatures) for a number of years without success. Much of the recent research in this area has focused on carbon atom based substances such as graphene, nanotubes and graphite because of their unique lattice structures, but thus far, no one has been able to figure out a way to use any of them to produce a material that superconducts at room temperature.
 
  • #45
As with the mag-lev, your entire latest post has nothing to do with the original subject.
 
  • #46
Danger said:
As with the mag-lev, your entire latest post has nothing to do with the original subject.
Its all related you.just fail to see it. A simple experiment to.support my magnetic assistance.water shedding take a magnet smooth exterior and say 6/8 in thick set it in a basin of water slightly deeper than magnets thickness it'll show.you how water does.react.to magnets either on magnetic scale minimal or electrons.in the water.building up around it pushing itself away from it
 
  • #47
Danger said:
As with the mag-lev, your entire latest post has nothing to do with the original subject.
And yes it did you just fail to see it
 
  • #48
 
Back
Top