Maurer-Cartan Form: Is it a One Form?

  • I
  • Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Form
In summary, the conversation is about the definition of a canonical (Maurer-Cartan) one form on a Lie group G, as defined by Nakahara in chapter 5.6.4 of Geometry Topology and Physics. The conversation discusses a theorem involving this one form and raises a question about its nature, to which the answer is that it is a ##\mathfrak g##-valued one form. The conversation continues to discuss the definition of a one-form and its relation to the ##(1,1)## tensor in question, ultimately concluding that the one-form in question is not a one-form in the traditional sense, but rather a ##\mathfrak g##-valued one-form.
  • #1
Silviu
624
11
Hello! I am reading Geometry Topology and Physics by Nakahara and in Chapter 5.6.4 he defines the canonical (Maurer-Cartan) one form on a Lie group G as: ##\theta : T_gG \to T_eG##. Then he states a theorem in which ##\theta = V_\mu \otimes \theta^\mu##. Both by the tensor product and by the definition from a vector space to another vector space, ##\theta## seems to be a ##(1,1)## tensor, not a one form, as it is stated in the book. Am I missing something? Is it a one form or not? Did I get wrong the definition of one form? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is a ##\mathfrak g## valued one form.
 
  • #3
Every ##(1,1)## tensor, say ##\varphi \otimes v \in U^* \otimes V## is equivalent to the linear map ##u \longmapsto \varphi(u)\cdot v##. Here we have ##v \in T_gG## and ##\varphi \in T_e^*G##.
 
  • #4
martinbn said:
It is a ##\mathfrak g## valued one form.
Isn't a one-form by definition a function from vectors to real numbers? And ##\mathfrak{g}## is isomorphic to ##T_gG## so it should behave the same whether it acts on vector fields or on simple vectors (tangents at e). But regardless of how you take it, I still don't understand why there is a basis vector (##V_\mu##), if it acts only on vectors and not on one-forms.
 
  • #5
fresh_42 said:
Every ##(1,1)## tensor, say ##\varphi \otimes v \in U^* \otimes V## is equivalent to the linear map ##u \longmapsto \varphi(u)\cdot v##. Here we have ##v \in T_gG## and ##\varphi \in T_e^*G##.
I am not sure I understand. Do you mean that a ##(1,1)## tensor can be transformed into a one-form by passing to it a one-form, which cancels the vector basis? But in our case, what would be that one-form? Like to me ##\theta## is clearly a ##(1,1)## tensor, and by the definition in the book the exactly same ##\theta##, without any modification is called a one-form. I am not sure I understand it...
 
  • #6

FAQ: Maurer-Cartan Form: Is it a One Form?

What is a Maurer-Cartan form?

A Maurer-Cartan form is a differential form used in differential geometry and Lie theory. It is used to define a connection on a principal bundle.

Is a Maurer-Cartan form a one form?

Yes, a Maurer-Cartan form is a one form, meaning it has a single input and produces a single output.

What is the purpose of a Maurer-Cartan form?

The purpose of a Maurer-Cartan form is to encode the information about the curvature of a connection on a principal bundle.

How is a Maurer-Cartan form related to Lie algebras?

A Maurer-Cartan form can be used to define a connection on a principal bundle associated with a Lie algebra. It is also used to define the structure equations of a Lie algebra.

Are there any applications of Maurer-Cartan forms?

Yes, Maurer-Cartan forms have various applications in theoretical physics, particularly in gauge theories and string theory. They are also used in the study of Lie groups and Lie algebras.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
25
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
832
Replies
12
Views
4K
Back
Top