Maxima of Diffraction Grating with 300 Lines/mm and Wavelength of 450 nm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Viviana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grating
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of diffraction maxima for light with a wavelength of 450 nm incident on a grating with 300 lines/mm. The equation used is d sin(theta) = n(lambda), where d is the grating spacing and n is the order of diffraction. The user initially calculated n as 7, but the correct answer is 15, indicating a misunderstanding of the maximum order of diffraction. It is clarified that maxima occur on both sides of the central maximum and that m can take integer values, including negative numbers and zero. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering all possible orders of diffraction to arrive at the correct answer.
Viviana
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Light of wavelength 450 nm is incident normally on a grating with 300 lines per millimeter. How many orders of diffraction maxima can be obtained?



Homework Equations


d sin(theta) = n(lambda)

The Attempt at a Solution


300 lines per millimeter is 3.33 x 10^-6. And 450 nm should be 4.5 x 10^ -7 m.
This is my equation:
3.33 x 10^-6 sin 90 = n (4.5 x 10^ -7)
I get n= 7.4 = 7
The correct answer is 15. But i just can't get this answer. =( Can someone please guide me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is in the middle point, just opposite to the centre of the grating, minimum or maximum? And are maxima at one side only? What values can m have?

ehild
 
Does that mean there are two maxima for each order?
 
ehild said:
What is in the middle point, just opposite to the centre of the grating, minimum or maximum? And are maxima at one side only? What values can m have?

ehild

Maxima are at both sides. But i still don't know how to get values of m.
 
Can you please give some more hints
 
m is integer, including negative numbers and zero. So the farthest maxima are either at 90°or -90°.

ehild
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
965
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
973
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K