Maximal ideals of a quotien ring

  • Thread starter Thread starter R.P.F.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that an ideal N is maximal in the quotient ring R/I if and only if N equals M/I, where M is a maximal ideal in R containing I. The initial attempt highlights that if N is maximal in R/I, then R/I/N is a field, implying I/N is maximal in R. Participants reference the fourth isomorphism theorem, which establishes a correspondence between ideals of R containing I and ideals of R/I, as a key tool for the proof. The conversation concludes with a participant successfully resolving their confusion using the provided hint. The statement regarding maximal ideals in quotient rings is confirmed as correct.
R.P.F.
Messages
210
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am try to prove :
Let R be a ring, I be a ideal of R.
Then N is a maximal in R/I if and only if N=M/I where M is a maximal ideal in R that contains I.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First I'm not 100% sure that the statement is true, but I'm trying to prove it.
So N is maximal in R/I, then R/I/N is a field which means I/N is maximal in R. This is as far as I get.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This statement is 100% correct. So don't worry about it.

Have you heard of the fourth isomorphism theorem (you probably didn't call it that). It states that there is a bijective correspondance between ideals of R that contain I and ideals of R/I.
In particular, if J is an ideal of R/I, then J=J'/I for some ideal J' of R.

This is the thing you have to use to prove this question. If you didn't see it, then perhaps you could try to prove it...
 
micromass said:
This statement is 100% correct. So don't worry about it.

Have you heard of the fourth isomorphism theorem (you probably didn't call it that). It states that there is a bijective correspondance between ideals of R that contain I and ideals of R/I.
In particular, if J is an ideal of R/I, then J=J'/I for some ideal J' of R.

This is the thing you have to use to prove this question. If you didn't see it, then perhaps you could try to prove it...

Yay I figured it out using your hint! Thanks a lot!
 
Well, x2 isn't an irreducible polynomial of R[x], since x2=x.x
Thus R[x]/(x2) is not a field.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K