B Maze Proof and Statistical Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
Recent research has established a significant connection between maze structures and statistical mechanics, particularly in understanding the behavior of random mazes composed of hexagonal grids. Mathematicians have long explored questions regarding the size of the largest clear paths and the probability of navigating from one edge of the maze to the center and back. The findings indicate that as the grid expands, the critical value for path connectivity increases at a surprisingly slow rate. This suggests a sharp boundary between different connectivity modes within the maze. The implications of this research extend to broader applications in statistical mechanics and complex systems.
jedishrfu
Mentor
Insights Author
Messages
15,496
Reaction score
10,230
https://www.quantamagazine.org/maze-proof-establishes-a-backbone-for-statistical-mechanics-20240207/

Imagine that a grid of hexagons, honeycomb-like, stretches before you. Some hexagons are empty; others are filled by a 6-foot tall column of solid concrete. The result is a maze of sorts. For over half a century, mathematicians have posed questions about such randomly generated mazes. How big is the largest web of cleared paths? What are the chances that there is a path from one edge to the center of the grid and back out again? How do those chances change as the grid swells in size, adding more and more hexagons to its edges?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236)
Replies
7
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236)
Replies
9
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top