Meaning of coefficients in polynomial potential for scalar field

PhysicsRock
Messages
121
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
For a potential ##V(\phi) = \sum_{k=0}^N c_k \phi^k##, we set ##c_k = 0## for all ##k \neq 2##. What is the physical meaning of ##c_2##?
Relevant Equations
Equation of motion ##\partial_\mu \partial^\mu \phi = 2c_2 \phi##.
For the solution of the equation of motion, we take a plane wave ##\phi(x) = e^{ik_\mu x^\mu}##. Plugged in, we obtain

$$
-(k_0)^2 + (\vec{k})^2 = 2c_2 \Rightarrow k_\mu k^\mu = 2c_2
$$

One can then find the group velocity (using ##(k_0)^2 = \omega^2##) to be

$$
\vec{v}_g = \frac{\vec{k}}{\sqrt{ \vec{k}^2 - 2c_2 }}
$$

which does not break causality only if ##c_2 \leq 0##. This leads to the assumption, at least from my perspective, that ##c_2## must be related to the mass / be the mass of the field, since if ##m = 0##, the field would propagate at the speed of light. However, using ##2c_2 = k_\mu k^\mu##, we can see that ##c_2## must have the same unit as ##k_\mu k^\mu##, i.e. m##^{-2}## in S.I. units.

Did I make a mistake along the way or am I misinterpreting the meaning of ##c_2 \leq 0##? Help is highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I've figured it out. We can set ##c = \hbar = 1##. Then ##p^\mu = k^\mu##, which implies ##k_\mu k^\mu = p_\mu p^\mu = p^2 = -m^2##. Thus, we get ##2c_2 = -m^2 \Leftrightarrow c_2 = -\frac{m^2}{2}##.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top