Measurement of Focal length with Laser beam

Click For Summary
To measure the focal length of a convex lens using a laser, one approach is to move a screen behind the lens to find the distance where the laser beam forms a sharp image, applying the lens formula 1/l + 1/d = 1/f. However, challenges arise due to the small size of the laser beam, making it difficult to determine the sharpest image distance accurately. Suggestions include using the laser as a bright light source to project a spot onto a screen or employing a diffraction grating to create multiple beams for easier convergence. Concerns about using diffraction gratings arise since the original problem does not mention them, indicating they may not be allowed. Ultimately, the goal is to evaluate how well the formula f = nR/(2(n-1)) describes the focal length, which complicates the use of parallel beams.
Alettix
Messages
177
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Hi!

I have lately come across some tricky experimental physics tasks, where no solution is given. Some of them involved parts where the focal length of a convex lens had to be measured with a laser. How do you do this?

Homework Equations


1/l + 1/d = 1/f (1)
where f is the focal lenght, l is the object distance and d the image distance)

M = d/l (2)
where M is the magnification

3. The Attempt at a Solution

First I thought that one should be moving a screen behind the lens looking for the distance at which the laser beem form a sharp image. At this distance equation 1 is valid . Because the beams from the laser are parallell, l = ∞ and therefore d = f.
However, trying this method out I quickly realized that with a so tiny "object" as a laser, the distance at which the image is the sharpest can not really be determined.

I tried to move the screen futher away and to some calculations from the magnification. But I guess that the formula for magnification is only valid at the image point as well, because this yield very weird results.

Could somebody please put me on the right track of how this kind of experimental task should be solved?
Thank you! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This Q has had me thinking. As yet I can't see any "laser" way of doing this. I thought maybe the physicists had some trick they could do here.

Anyhow, I didn't like the two parallel lasers as it did not look very accurate to me, though maybe I'm wrong - I'll have to try it.
My two thoughts are:
Just use it as a bright light. Put a spot on a screen and try to get an image of that spot on another screen, as you'd do with an ordinary lamp.
Use a diffraction grating (or CD - we don't need anything specific) to split the laser beam into two (& more) emanating from a single point. Use the lens to focus two of these reflected (or transmitted, with appropriate grating) beams to a single point. Since you are not looking for focus, just convergence, it should be easier to find the focal point.
laser_lens.png

Edit: just doing the sums and I think a CD would be too fine a grating, so you may have to get a proper grating, unless you know of something else.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Alettix
Merlin3189 said:
Just use it as a bright light. Put a spot on a screen and try to get an image of that spot on another screen, as you'd do with an ordinary lamp.
Use a diffraction grating (or CD - we don't need anything specific) to split the laser beam into two (& more) emanating from a single point.

Thank you Sir, I think the spot on a screen might be the solution, although I am worried about the tiny diameter of the laser beam...

The problem description did not mention diffraction granting, so I assume that it shouldn't be used (these experimental problems are old ones from a physics competition, so if there is no diffraction granting in the description, the competitors were not allowed to use it). Also, the actual goal of the problem was to determine how well the formula:
f = nR/(2(n-1))
Describes the focal length of a spherical lens (with radius R and index of refraction n) as a function of deviation from the optical axis (where the formula is assumed to be true). This means that parallel beams cannot really be used, because they already deviate from the optical axis. Or am I wrong?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
995
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K