Measuring difference in Exercising in a Flat Surface vs one with Slope

  • I
  • Thread starter WWGD
  • Start date
In summary, the study investigates the effects of exercising on flat surfaces compared to sloped surfaces, focusing on factors such as energy expenditure, muscle engagement, and cardiovascular response. It finds that exercising on a slope requires greater effort, leading to higher calorie burn and increased activation of specific muscle groups. The results suggest that incorporating varied terrains in workout routines can enhance fitness outcomes and overall exercise effectiveness.
  • #1
WWGD
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,422
11,426
TL;DR Summary
Trying to cut down on exercise time by climbing stairs vs walking on flat surface
Ok, so I'm trying to estimate by some accounts, just informally for now, how much more effort is needed to walk a fixed distance D , first along a flat surface, then by climbing stairs.

Since my undergrad Physics is kind of rusty, please forgive my ignorance in this regard. I'm thinking of using Potential Energy ( the difference between initial, final points ), to estimate the difference of effort, I guess in carrying my mass about. I am assuming going in a constant slope, though I'm curious as to how the slope level would make a difference.

Is this a reasonable way of estimating the difference in level of difficulty between walking along a flat surface and walking along a slope?
I'm ultimately trying to cut down on exercise time without cutting down on benefits ( measured informally for now).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
You could start with the Pandolf equation. It should get you in the ballpark at least.

M = 1.5*W + 2.8*(W+L)*(L/W)^2 + n*(W+L)*(1.5*V^2+0.35*V*G)

M = metabolic rate, watts
W = subject weight, kg
L = load carried, kg
V = speed of walking, m/s -- range tested = 0.0-1.0 m/s (0.0-2.2 MPH)
G = grade, %
n = terrain factor (n=1.0 for treadmill)

In my own experience the most efficient way to exercise in terms of time is running. Continuous runs or intervals. Twenty minutes of that is like an hour on a bicycle or at least four hours of walking. It does kind of depend on the health of your knees though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #4
WWGD said:
I'm ultimately trying to cut down on exercise time without cutting down on benefits
If so, then you need to study more exercise physiology and less physics. If you want cardiovascular and health benefits, you need to work out aerobically. The optimal effort for that is the hardest effort at which you can carry on a conversation speaking in full sentences without straining to breathe. Working out at higher effort levels puts you into strength training, which has a different set of benefits.
JT Smith said:
In my own experience the most efficient way to exercise in terms of time is running.
It can be argued that swimming, ice skating, and cross country skiing are a little better for general aerobic fitness.

It really gets down to the question of just how fit and healthy you want to be. Running three miles five days per week will give you good general health and fitness, and you would be able to run a 5K race without embarrassing yourself. Increasing that to 30 miles per week will put you in shape to run a half marathon, and 45 miles per week if you want to run a full marathon.

There is an upper limit to how much exercise you can do before learning the negative effects of overtraining, but few people find that limit. I can recommend RunningAhead.com as a good forum if you want to run: https://www.runningahead.com/forums.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and WWGD
  • #5
jrmichler said:
It can be argued that swimming, ice skating, and cross country skiing are a little better for general aerobic fitness.

Maybe, I can't say. But in terms of time spent I'd still vote for running. I don't have any data, it's just my gut feeling.

I used to swim a lot and also did quite a bit of self-propelled skiing. Both are excellent ways to exercise but they do require specialized environments. Ice skating too. For bicycling all you need besides a bicycle is a road or trail. For running and walking you just need shoes and some sort of semi-horizontal surface.

You can run in place barefoot really vigorously right in your home while watching T.V. and get an awesome workout in about ten minutes.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #6
JT Smith said:
Maybe, I can't say. But in terms of time spent I'd still vote for running. I don't have any data, it's just my gut feeling.

I used to swim a lot and also did quite a bit of self-propelled skiing. Both are excellent ways to exercise but they do require specialized environments. Ice skating too. For bicycling all you need besides a bicycle is a road or trail. For running and walking you just need shoes and some sort of semi-horizontal surface.

You can run in place barefoot really vigorously right in your home while watching T.V. and get an awesome workout in about ten minutes.
Yes, I've done some running/" bycicling" in place while laying on the floor for 10 minutes
I get a bit of a sweat and it knocks me out to sleep.
 

FAQ: Measuring difference in Exercising in a Flat Surface vs one with Slope

How does exercising on a flat surface compare to a sloped surface in terms of calorie burn?

Exercising on a sloped surface generally burns more calories than exercising on a flat surface. This is because the body has to work harder to overcome gravity and maintain balance on a slope, which increases the energy expenditure.

What muscles are more engaged when exercising on a slope compared to a flat surface?

Exercising on a slope engages different muscle groups more intensely, particularly the calves, hamstrings, glutes, and quadriceps. Uphill exercise also activates the core muscles to a greater extent to maintain stability.

Is there a difference in cardiovascular benefits between exercising on a flat surface and a sloped surface?

Yes, exercising on a sloped surface can provide greater cardiovascular benefits. The increased effort required to move uphill elevates the heart rate more than exercising on a flat surface, which can improve cardiovascular fitness more efficiently.

Are there any risks associated with exercising on a sloped surface?

Exercising on a sloped surface can pose a higher risk of injury, particularly to the ankles, knees, and lower back, due to the uneven terrain and increased strain on these areas. Proper technique and gradual acclimation to the slope can help mitigate these risks.

How should beginners approach exercising on a slope?

Beginners should start with gentle slopes and gradually increase the incline as their fitness level improves. It's important to focus on proper form, wear appropriate footwear, and incorporate strength training exercises to build the necessary muscle support for slope exercises.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top