I Measuring Low Resistance: Why Meter Bridge is the Preferred Choice

AI Thread Summary
The meter bridge is preferred over the post office box for measuring low resistance due to its superior sensitivity and accuracy. The post office box, which operates as a Wheatstone bridge, is limited in its measurement range and primarily used for identifying short circuits rather than measuring resistance. Its design does not effectively utilize the meter's sensitivity because it is affected by the bridge components. Additionally, the meter bridge allows for a more precise measurement technique by enabling current to pass through the meter for full-scale deflection before measuring the voltage drop across an unknown low resistance. Overall, the meter bridge is more effective for low resistance measurements compared to the post office box.
phymath7
Messages
48
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
Why post office box can't be used to measure high or low resistance?
Why meter bridge is chosen over post office box to measure low resistance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is "post office box" (or "vox")?
 
Ah. According to the Wikipedia article the Post Office Box (origin UK) is in fact a Wheatstone bridge circuit.
 
phymath7 said:
TL;DR Summary: Why post office box can't be used to measure high or low resistance?

Why meter bridge is chosen over post office box to measure low resistance?
Who says it can't be used to measure high or low resistance ?
The post office box was two arms of a Wheatstone bridge.
It was used to find short circuits, not open breaks in the line.
 
phymath7 said:
TL;DR Summary: Why post office box can't be used to measure high or low resistance?

Why meter bridge is chosen over post office box to measure low resistance?
I think the measurement range will be limited by the available ratio arms and standard resistances. In addition, a bridge does not make best use of the meter sensitivity because it is shunted by the bridge components. There is a sensitive method for low resistances where we first pass a current through the meter to give full scale deflection and then measure the drop in reading when the meter is shunted by the unknown low resistance.
(Sorry, I recently disposed of my copy of "Telephony", by Herbert and Proctor, which would have given the definitive answer).
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top