MHB Mechanics- connected particles

AI Thread Summary
A 3kg bucket filled with 6kg of bricks is released from a height of 22.5m, causing a second 3kg bucket on the ground to rise. Initially, both buckets are at rest, leading to zero acceleration. The forces acting on the buckets include the weight of the descending bucket and the tension in the rope. The correct approach involves calculating the net force and acceleration for both buckets, leading to a time of 3 seconds for the descending bucket to reach the ground. A proper Free Body Diagram is essential for accurately analyzing the forces involved.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A bucket of mass 3kg rests on scaffolding at the top of a building. The scaffolding is 22.5m above the ground. The bucket is attached to a rope that passes over a smooth pulley. At the other end of the rope there is another bucket of mass 3kg, which initially rests on the ground. The bucket at the top of the building is filled with 6kg of bricks and is gently released. As this bucket descends the other bucket rises.
Find how long it will take the descending bucket to reach the ground.
I have no clue how to solve this.
Initially the acceleration is zero as both the buckets are at rest. R= 90N for the top bucket and T= 30N for the bottom bucket.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What have you tried? Did you start by sketching out a Free Body Diagram?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
What have you tried? Did you start by sketching out a Free Body
20210524_131325.jpg
20210524_131332.jpg
20210524_131343.jpg
 
topsquark said:
What have you tried? Did you start by sketching out a Free Body Diagram?

-Dan
I think I realized where I have done the mistake. I need to calculate the F= m×a of the 9kg bucket going down taking its acceleration as negative and the bucket of 3 kg coming up acceleration as positive. I get t= 3s
Is this the right way? My freeborn diagram is wrong for the bucket that's on the top
 
057069FC-7566-42FE-9AB6-20D91B4E602D.jpeg
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top