Membrane locking and CST triangle

In summary, linear triangles can exhibit membrane locking for large deformations of plates/shells due to differences in stiffness in different directions.
  • #1
topcomer
37
0
I often read on books that linear triangles do not have membrane locking for large deformations of plates/shells. I completely don't understand how this is possible. If one uses the well-known CST, stretching is measured as the increase in length of each edge of the triangle. Then, in the limit of the membrane stiffness going to infinity, clearly the solution cannot approximate any bending-dominated state, but rather it will be always rigid on general meshes (i.e. Minkowski theorem for convex bodies), allowing at most bending about few lines on very regular ones. What am I missing?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
The thing you are missing is that linear triangles do not necessarily have the same stiffness in all directions. For example, in a triangular plate with a membrane locking behavior, the stiffness in the bending direction (the direction perpendicular to the plane of the triangle) may be much higher than the stiffness in the stretching direction (the direction parallel to the plane of the triangle). In this case, even though the overall stiffness of the triangle is finite, it will behave like an infinite stiffness in the bending direction, thus preventing large deformations in that direction.
 

FAQ: Membrane locking and CST triangle

What is membrane locking and how does it affect the CST triangle?

Membrane locking is a phenomenon that occurs when a membrane element, such as a thin plate or shell, is subjected to loading. It causes the element to stiffen and resist deformation, which can have an impact on the CST (constant strain triangle) used in finite element analysis. Essentially, membrane locking limits the accuracy of the CST triangle in accurately predicting deformation and stresses in thin structures.

What causes membrane locking to occur?

Membrane locking is caused by the in-plane shear deformation of a membrane element. This deformation causes the element to become stiffer and resist bending, resulting in a loss of accuracy in the CST triangle. It is more likely to occur in elements with a high aspect ratio (length-to-thickness ratio) and when the loading is concentrated in a small area.

How can we overcome membrane locking in finite element analysis?

There are several methods that can be used to overcome membrane locking in finite element analysis. These include using higher-order elements, such as quadratic or cubic elements, which have a higher accuracy in predicting shear deformation. Another approach is to use reduced integration techniques, which can help to reduce the effects of membrane locking. Additionally, using mesh refinement in the areas of high stress concentration can also help to mitigate the effects of membrane locking.

What are the limitations of the CST triangle due to membrane locking?

The limitations of the CST triangle due to membrane locking include a loss of accuracy in predicting stresses and deformations in thin structures. This can result in an overestimation or underestimation of the true values. Additionally, membrane locking can also lead to numerical instability and convergence issues in finite element analysis.

Can membrane locking be completely avoided in finite element analysis?

No, it is not possible to completely avoid membrane locking in finite element analysis. However, its effects can be minimized by using appropriate element types and mesh refinement techniques. It is important for engineers to be aware of the potential for membrane locking and take necessary steps to mitigate its effects in their analyses.

Similar threads

Back
Top