Method of moments/maximum likelihood

In summary, the conversation discusses using the method of moments and the method of maximum likelihood to estimate the parameter Θ in a binomial distribution with N independent random variables. The method of moments involves finding the mean of the random variables, while the method of maximum likelihood involves maximizing the likelihood function. Both methods result in an estimate of Θ.
  • #1
Gémeaux
4
0
I just needed some help with a few questions.

Consider N independent random variables having identical binomial distributions with parameters Θ and n= 3. If n0 of them take on the value 0, n1 of them take on the value 1, n2 of them take on the value 2 and n3 of them take on the value 3, use the method of moments to find a formula for estimating Θ.

Since X=nΘ, therefore X=3Θ. Now we need to find the mean of the random variables, which is (0*n0+1*n1+2*n2+3*n3)/N, since there are N random variables. So we get 3Θ = (n1+2n2+3n3)/N. Hence, Θ=(n1+2n2+3n3)/3N

Could someone tell me if I'm doing this right? Also, how would you use the method of maximum likelihood to estimate Θ?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, you are doing this correctly. For the method of maximum likelihood, we need to find the value of Θ that maximizes the likelihood function. The likelihood function for this problem is given by: L(θ) = n0(1-θ)^3 + n1(1-θ)^2θ + n2(1-θ)θ^2 + n3θ^3. To find the value of Θ that maximizes L(θ), we need to differentiate L(θ) and set it equal to 0. This will give us a quadratic equation whose roots will give us the value of Θ that maximizes the likelihood. The solution of this equation will result in an estimate of Θ.
 
  • #3


Yes, you are on the right track with using the method of moments to estimate Θ. Another way to think about it is to equate the theoretical mean of the binomial distribution, which is np, to the sample mean, which is (n1+2n2+3n3)/N. So we get np = (n1+2n2+3n3)/N, which gives us the same formula as before for estimating Θ.

To use the method of maximum likelihood to estimate Θ, we need to first write out the likelihood function, which is the probability of observing the data given the parameter Θ. In this case, it would be the product of the binomial probabilities for each of the possible outcomes (0, 1, 2, and 3). So the likelihood function would be L(Θ) = (Θ^0)(1-Θ)^n0 * (Θ^1)(1-Θ)^n1 * (Θ^2)(1-Θ)^n2 * (Θ^3)(1-Θ)^n3.

To find the maximum likelihood estimate of Θ, we would take the derivative of the likelihood function with respect to Θ, set it equal to 0, and solve for Θ. This would give us the value of Θ that maximizes the likelihood of observing the given data. However, in this case, the derivative is not easy to solve analytically, so we can use numerical methods or software to find the maximum likelihood estimate of Θ.

Overall, both the method of moments and the method of maximum likelihood can be used to estimate parameters in a statistical model. The method of moments is simpler and easier to understand, but the method of maximum likelihood is more powerful and can handle more complex models.
 

Related to Method of moments/maximum likelihood

1. What is the difference between method of moments and maximum likelihood?

The method of moments is a statistical technique used to estimate the parameters of a population by equating sample moments to population moments. On the other hand, maximum likelihood is a statistical method used to determine the parameters of a population by maximizing the likelihood function, which measures the probability of obtaining the observed data.

2. When should I use method of moments over maximum likelihood?

Method of moments is typically used when there are a small number of parameters to be estimated and the sample size is large. It is also useful when the data follows a simple distribution, such as a normal distribution. Maximum likelihood, on the other hand, is more suitable for complex distributions and larger sample sizes.

3. How do I choose between method of moments and maximum likelihood?

The choice between method of moments and maximum likelihood depends on the specific problem at hand. It is important to consider the underlying assumptions of each method and the distribution of the data. In general, maximum likelihood is preferred when the sample size is large and the data follows a complex distribution, while method of moments is more suitable for smaller sample sizes and simpler distributions.

4. Can method of moments and maximum likelihood be used together?

Yes, it is possible to combine method of moments and maximum likelihood in certain cases. This approach is called the method of moments estimation using maximum likelihood. It involves using the method of moments to obtain initial estimates for the parameters, which are then refined using maximum likelihood. This can result in more accurate parameter estimates.

5. What are the limitations of method of moments and maximum likelihood?

Both method of moments and maximum likelihood have their own limitations. Method of moments may not be suitable for complex distributions and may produce biased estimates for small sample sizes. Maximum likelihood, on the other hand, relies on the assumption that the data follows a specific distribution, which may not always be true. It can also be computationally intensive for large sample sizes.

Back
Top