Midpoint Formula: Intuitive Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Primus_
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The midpoint formula, (X1 + X2)/2, represents the average of two points and is intuitively understood as the point equidistant from both. Initially, there was confusion regarding the formula, with a suggestion that it should be (X2 - X1)/2 + X1 instead. However, the realization emerged that the average formula correctly identifies the midpoint. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing that the average of two numbers is inherently the midpoint. Ultimately, the formula's simplicity aligns with its purpose in determining the midpoint between two points.
Primus_
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I have a simple question that's giving me some intuition issues. The midpoint between two points being (X1+X2)/2. To me, I can't really get this to make sense... intuitively I'd think the formula should be (X2-X1)/2 + X1. I mean, I see why it wouldn't be used with the latter formula being the more involved one. But my problem is, unlike the second formula - I just don't intuitively recognize the first as a solution to this simple problem.

I'm taking college physics right now, and while this isn't a detriment to my understanding of the subject... it's still bugging me!

Thanks in advance :).

EDIT: Ya know, never mind on this question. Flawed logic FTL! X2/2 +X1/2.. duh! Not sure how that passed my filter. Realized this right about as I hit submit... lol :)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The midpoint between x and y is defined as the point lying on the segment xy and equidistant to both points. Try to work out what the formula needs to be.
 
Primus_ said:
Hey guys, I have a simple question that's giving me some intuition issues. The midpoint between two points being (X1+X2)/2. To me, I can't really get this to make sense... intuitively I'd think the formula should be (X2-X1)/2 + X1. I mean, I see why it wouldn't be used with the latter formula being the more involved one. But my problem is, unlike the second formula - I just don't intuitively recognize the first as a solution to this simple problem.

I'm taking college physics right now, and while this isn't a detriment to my understanding of the subject... it's still bugging me!

Thanks in advance :).

EDIT: Ya know, never mind on this question. Flawed logic FTL! X2/2 +X1/2.. duh! Not sure how that passed my filter. Realized this right about as I hit submit... lol :)
Well, I was going to point out that (X1+ X2)/2= (X2- X1)/2+ X1 but I guess that is not necessary now!

But surely you could have recognized that (X1+ X2)/2 is their average and the average of two numbers is exactly half way between them.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top