Migration Path of Electrons in Ionized Air (Gamma Radiation)

In summary: That depends on the details of the collision.so there is no "path" that the electrons will flow? we are essentially trying to determine the magnetic field generated by the resulting interactions from the gamma interactions. Do the electrons tend to correct the potential difference by being absorbed back at the earlier parts of the gamma radiator? basically do the ions arc back to the positive ions created?There is no single path that the electrons will follow, as they will interact with various atoms and particles along their trajectory. The resulting magnetic field will depend on the specific interactions and the properties of the material. As for the potential difference, it will be balanced by the creation of free charges through ionization processes. Whether the electrons will
  • #1
sapratz
27
0
I would love some clarification on a gamma ray process. This is what I understand so far:

Electrons are accelerated at 19MeV at a cathode which is releasing gamma ray photons with an energy of 1.9MeV. Is it possible to generalize the emission number of photons (roughly) to be equal to the 19MeV/1.9MeV (per electron fired)?

Assuming that is okay, we can move on to the range of the gamma photons in air. If I have calculated the decreasing exponential curve describing the number of photons present at each point in the gamma ray beam, can I take the derivative of this function spatially to be able to calculate the number of collisions at any given point?

Assuming that's alright, I have the number of collisions happening at any given point and I have calculated that the interactions are mostly compton (from high energy photons). I used the generalized for for maximum energy transfer:


Emax = 1.9MeV(2*(3.718/8.436)) = 1.67MeV transferred to each electron, with the remainder producing a photon at a frequency of 5.56e19Hz.

(We are only looking at the first wave of interactions, not the successive photon interactions)

so we have the energy of an ionized electron and the number of electrons that are being ejected at any given point from the beam.

My REAL question (assuming all that other stuff is correct) is can we calculate the charges moving at each point to essentially develop a current profile at any given point along the beam?

And also, just conceptually, does anyone have any idea as to the path the electrons will take after they are released? how does the system balance the potential difference developed? Does it arc to ground, or does it loop back to the start of the beam?

Thanks,
Scott
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Electrons are accelerated at 19MeV at a cathode which is releasing gamma ray photons with an energy of 1.9MeV.
Why should it emit photons with exactly 1.9 MeV?
Is it possible to generalize the emission number of photons (roughly) to be equal to the 19MeV/1.9MeV (per electron fired)?
You want 10 1.9MeV-photons per incoming electron? I think it would be a great achievement if you get something close to 1.

can I take the derivative of this function spatially to be able to calculate the number of collisions at any given point?
Sure.

Emax = 1.9MeV(2*(3.718/8.436)) = 1.67MeV transferred to each electron, with the remainder producing a photon at a frequency of 5.56e19Hz.
This is the maximal energy transfer, the actual energy transfer can be lower.
In addition, you get pair production.

My REAL question (assuming all that other stuff is correct) is can we calculate the charges moving at each point to essentially develop a current profile at any given point along the beam?
It should be possible to calculate the estimated rate of electrons everywhere.

And also, just conceptually, does anyone have any idea as to the path the electrons will take after they are released?
They ionize some other atoms, emit some bremsstrahlung and so on - the typical processes for fast electrons.
how does the system balance the potential difference developed?
You create a lot of free charges in ionizing processes. I guess those are sufficient to balance the currents.
 
  • #3
I don't know how to navigate the the forum very well, so I'll just copy paste, but thanks for the response.


Why should it emit photons with exactly 1.9 MeV?

-The particle guys gave us that number, it's the average energy per photon released from the accelerator. Why do you think this number is odd?


You want 10 1.9MeV-photons per incoming electron? I think it would be a great achievement if you get something close to 1.

-Where does the conservation of energy come into play here? I assumed that since the electrons were colliding with an energy and were experiencing breaking radiation until absorption they were going to emit photons of equal energy. That's where I got the number.


This is the maximal energy transfer, the actual energy transfer can be lower.
In addition, you get pair production.

- how much lower is the energy do you think? does the percentage transferred depend on the amount of energy contained in the photon? i was trying to determine what the angle of ejection was to calculate the amount of energy transferred, but I couldn't find anything on it. I didn't know if there was a distribution of probabilities based on the element/compound type but I was having trouble.


They ionize some other atoms, emit some bremsstrahlung and so on - the typical processes for fast electrons.

- so there is no "path" that the electrons will flow? we are essentially trying to determine the magnetic field generated by the resulting interactions from the gamma interactions. Do the electrons tend to correct the potential difference by being absorbed back at the earlier parts of the gamma radiator? basically do the ions arc back to the positive ions created?

thanks
 
  • #4
You can quote things by putting [noparse]
[/noparse]-tags around them:
[noparse]
text
[/noparse] becomes
text

Why should it emit photons with exactly 1.9 MeV?

-The particle guys gave us that number, it's the average energy per photon released from the accelerator. Why do you think this number is odd?
As an average energy, it is fine. I would expect a very broad spectrum.

-Where does the conservation of energy come into play here? I assumed that since the electrons were colliding with an energy and were experiencing breaking radiation until absorption they were going to emit photons of equal energy. That's where I got the number.
The broad spectrum is a partial answer: You get photons of different energy, too. In addition, some (most?) energy is lost in the material, only some fraction will get emitted as radiation. And that radiation is undirected.

- how much lower is the energy do you think?
Photon energy losses in the Compton effect can be anything from zero to the maximal energy loss. Correspondingly, electrons can get an energy from zero to the maximal energy.

does the percentage transferred depend on the amount of energy contained in the photon?
The photon energy is relevant, as it determines the maximal energy transfer and the scale of the whole process.

i was trying to determine what the angle of ejection was to calculate the amount of energy transferred, but I couldn't find anything on it.
This is the standard Compton effect formula.

I didn't know if there was a distribution of probabilities based on the element/compound type but I was having trouble.
I am sure this has been studied (and calculated), but I don't know where.

- so there is no "path" that the electrons will flow?
Well, they tend to go in the direction of the initial gamma ray, with a wide spread around that direction.
we are essentially trying to determine the magnetic field generated by the resulting interactions from the gamma interactions.
You might get some small net current along the beam direction (if you form a beam of gamma rays).

Do the electrons tend to correct the potential difference by being absorbed back at the earlier parts of the gamma radiator? basically do the ions arc back to the positive ions created?
I doubt this. There are so many other electrons to balance the charges.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
I am still unsure where the gamma photons are coming from. It appears that this is entirely from the electrons that was accelerated to 19 MeV? Over what distance are they accelerated to give that 1.9 MeV gamma? I've accelerated electrons to 8 MeV over a distance of about 10 cm, and we detect no gamma. In fact, what we detect is "beam loading" in the RF cavity (i.e. it "sucked" in EM field).

Now, if the 19 MeV electrons were to crash onto, say, the stainless steel pipe or some high-Z material, then I definitely know those generate lots of gamma via Bremsstrahlung (I used to deal with accelerator safety and shielding issues a lot!).

Zz.
 
  • #6
ZapperZ said:
I am still unsure where the gamma photons are coming from. It appears that this is entirely from the electrons that was accelerated to 19 MeV? Over what distance are they accelerated to give that 1.9 MeV gamma? I've accelerated electrons to 8 MeV over a distance of about 10 cm, and we detect no gamma. In fact, what we detect is "beam loading" in the RF cavity (i.e. it "sucked" in EM field).

Now, if the 19 MeV electrons were to crash onto, say, the stainless steel pipe or some high-Z material, then I definitely know those generate lots of gamma via Bremsstrahlung (I used to deal with accelerator safety and shielding issues a lot!).

Zz.

Yes, the 19MeV electrons are colliding with a very High-Z material and that is how the 1.9MeV photons are being produced
 
  • #7
sapratz said:
Yes, the 19MeV electrons are colliding with a very High-Z material and that is how the 1.9MeV photons are being produced

Then you should have given this vital info, because it also means that you have left out a very important piece of information: the thickness of this material.

In such a Bremsstrahlung radiation, most of the radiation emitted is along the direction of the path of the electrons, i.e. the forward direction. How much of these gamma photons that got through is, obviously, a direct function of the thickness of the material due to the attenuation effects inside the material.

So as you have described the problem, there is at least one major piece of info that is missing.

Zz.
 
  • #8
ZapperZ said:
So as you have described the problem, there is at least one major piece of info that is missing.

Zz.

120mil tantalum :)

so the average energy of the gamma photons released is 1.9MeV and the number that is actually released is dependent upon the thickness and density of the plate material? That makes sense I guess. Any ideas on some formulas for this calculation?

Also, do you think there will be current traveling on the plate due to electron interactions?
 

FAQ: Migration Path of Electrons in Ionized Air (Gamma Radiation)

What is the migration path of electrons in ionized air?

The migration path of electrons in ionized air refers to the movement of electrons within a gas or air that has been ionized by gamma radiation. When gamma radiation interacts with air molecules, it can cause the molecules to lose or gain electrons, creating positively and negatively charged ions. The electrons then move towards the positively charged ions, creating a path of migration.

How does gamma radiation ionize air molecules?

Gamma radiation has high energy and can easily penetrate through materials, including air. When it interacts with air molecules, it can knock off electrons from their outer shells, creating ions. This process is known as ionization, and it can also occur in other materials, such as solids and liquids.

What factors affect the migration path of electrons in ionized air?

The migration path of electrons in ionized air can be affected by several factors, including the energy of the gamma radiation, the density of the air, and the presence of other particles or molecules in the air. Additionally, the strength of the electric field and the concentration of charged ions can also influence the path of electron migration.

How does the migration path of electrons in ionized air affect human health?

The migration path of electrons in ionized air is a natural process that occurs in our environment. However, exposure to high levels of gamma radiation can be harmful to human health as it can cause damage to cells and DNA. This is why safety measures, such as shielding and proper monitoring, are essential in environments where gamma radiation is present.

Can the migration path of electrons in ionized air be controlled?

The migration path of electrons in ionized air can be influenced by external factors, such as electric fields, but it cannot be fully controlled. However, proper precautions and safety measures can be taken to minimize potential harm from gamma radiation, such as using appropriate shielding and monitoring equipment.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
356
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top