Minimize Crease Length of Paper in Terms of Width

  • MHB
  • Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date
In summary, Mark found a solution where c = 3wSQRT(3), and booleans were discarded. There are only 4 solutions if the "minimum L" condition is removed.
  • #1
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
13,288
12
Hello MHB,

Consider a rectangular piece of paper of width $W$ laid on a flat surface. The lower left corner of the paper is bought over to the right edge of the paper, and the paper is smoothed flat creating a crease of length $L$, as in the diagram:

View attachment 1078

What is the minimal value of $L$ in terms of $W$?
 

Attachments

  • creaselength.jpg
    creaselength.jpg
    6 KB · Views: 110
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
MarkFL said:
Hello MHB,

Consider a rectangular piece of paper of width $W$ laid on a flat surface. The lower left corner of the paper is bought over to the right edge of the paper, and the paper is smoothed flat creating a crease of length $L$, as in the diagram:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1078
...A...... B

What is the minimal value of $L$ in terms of $W$?
When AB = 3W/4

a = AB
L^2 = (2a^3) / (2a - w)

Above is my contribution...(Coffee)
 
  • #3
Wilmer said:
When AB = 3W/4

a = AB
L^2 = (2a^3) / (2a - w)

Above is my contribution...(Coffee)

This is correct...can you show how you arrived at this solution? (Sun)
 
  • #4
Code:
A                       F 
                        D 
 
 
C                 B     E
a = BC = BD, b = AC = AD, c = AB, w = AF

Mark, that's a frustratingly delightful li'l problem!
Boils down to 2 congruent right triangles (ABC and ABD)
stuck together along the common hypotenuse AB, then
"completing the rectangle" (ACEF) thus forming
2 similar right triangles (ADF and BDE).

Simple enough it appears, but I'm kinda stuck.

I've been able to "see" that when c (your L) is at minimum,
then b = aSQRT(2) and c = aSQRT(3); so c = 3wSQRT(3) / 4,
using my previous observation: a = (3/4)w.

So I need to come up with some equation such that after
taking its 1st derivative, I'm left with 4c = 3wSQRT(3).

Can't wrap it up; take me out of my misery!
 
  • #5
Wilmer said:
...Can't wrap it up; take me out of my misery!

Okay, here is my solution:

I have filled in the previous diagram with the information I need:

View attachment 1087

By similarity, we may state:

\(\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{L^2-x^2}}{W}=\frac{x}{\sqrt{W(2x-W)}}\)

Squaring, we obtain:

\(\displaystyle \frac{L^2-x^2}{W^2}=\frac{x^2}{W(2x-W)}\)

\(\displaystyle L^2-x^2=\frac{Wx^2}{2x-W}\)

\(\displaystyle L^2=\frac{2x^3}{2x-W}\)

At this point we see that we require \(\displaystyle \frac{W}{2}<x\le W\).

Minimizing $L^2$ will also minimize $L$, and so differentiating with respect to $x$ and equating to zero, we find:

\(\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx}\left(L^2 \right)=\frac{(2x-W)\left(6x^2 \right)-(2)\left(2x^3 \right)}{(2x-W)^2}=\frac{2x^2(4x-3W)}{(2x-W)^2}=0\)

Discarding the root outside of the meaningful domain, we are left with:

\(\displaystyle 4x-3W=0\)

\(\displaystyle x=\frac{3}{4}W\)

The first derivative test easily shows that this is a minimum, as the linear factor in the numerator, the only factor which changes sign, goes from negative to positive across this critical value.

Thus, we may state:

\(\displaystyle L_{\min}=L\left(\frac{3}{4}W \right)=\sqrt{\frac{2\left(\frac{3}{4}W \right)^3}{2\left(\frac{3}{4}W \right)-W}}=\frac{3\sqrt{3}}{4}W\)
 

Attachments

  • creaselength2.jpg
    creaselength2.jpg
    9.4 KB · Views: 82
  • #6
Thanks Mark.
Somewhat tougher than I thought...
Sure glad to see the SQRT(3)!
 
  • #7
Damn! I was ok up to your L^2 = 2x^3 / (2x - W) , then to 2x^2(4x - 3W) = 0

Entirely forgot about this:
"Discarding the root outside of the meaningful domain, we are left with:"

Gotta good memory, but it's short (Emo)

(I don't have enough hair to do that!)

Again, NICE problem.
 
  • #8
Of course, there will be no "all integer" solutions.
Interestingly, very few exist if "minimum L" condition is removed;
only 4 primitives keeping short leg of right triangle < 10000:
(right triangle sides, W):
75,100, 125, 96
845, 2028, 2197, 1440
2312, 4335, 4913, 3600
4375, 15000, 15625, 8064
 

FAQ: Minimize Crease Length of Paper in Terms of Width

What is the importance of minimizing crease length of paper in terms of width?

The crease length of paper in terms of width is important because it affects the structural integrity and appearance of the paper. A longer crease can weaken the paper and make it more prone to tearing or wrinkling, while a shorter crease can make the paper appear more smooth and professional.

How does the width of the paper impact the crease length?

The width of the paper directly affects the length of the crease because a wider paper will require a longer crease to fold neatly and maintain its shape. Therefore, minimizing the width of the paper can help to reduce the length of the crease.

What factors can contribute to a longer crease length?

Several factors can contribute to a longer crease length, such as the thickness and type of paper, the method of folding, and the skill of the person folding the paper. Thicker and stiffer paper may require a longer crease to fold neatly, while incorrect folding techniques can also result in a longer crease.

How can the crease length of paper be minimized?

To minimize the crease length of paper, one can use thinner and more pliable paper, employ proper folding techniques, and use tools such as a bone folder to create a sharp and precise crease. Additionally, using a scoring tool to create a groove along the fold line can also help to minimize the crease length.

What are some practical applications of minimizing crease length of paper in terms of width?

Minimizing the crease length of paper can be beneficial in various industries, such as packaging, printing, and bookbinding. It can also be useful for personal projects, such as origami and card making, to achieve a more polished and professional look. Additionally, minimizing crease length can also help to reduce paper waste and save costs in production.

Back
Top