MHB Minimum area of an odd number-sided, equilateral polygon with side lengths of 1 unit.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the minimum area of equilateral polygons with an odd number of sides, specifically questioning if any such polygon can have an area less than that of an equilateral triangle, which is \(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}\) square units. Participants express skepticism about the possibility of achieving a smaller area, with one suggesting that the twisting nature of the sides might reduce the net area. However, the consensus leans towards the belief that no odd-sided equilateral polygon can have an area smaller than that of the triangle. The conversation avoids delving into proofs, focusing instead on intuitive reasoning. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the area cannot be less than \(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}\) square units.
checkitagain
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
Suppose you look at all of the equilateral (non-self-intersecting)
polygons** with an odd number of sides, and each side length is
equal to 1 unit.

For examples, the polygon with the fewest number of sides in this group
is the equilateral triangle, and then the next one is an equilateral pentagon.

Has anyone thought about this?

The area of the equilateral triangle is \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{4} square units.Is the area of any of these certain polygons (beyond the equilateral triangle)

less than \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{4} square units?
Please, do not attempt any sort of a proof. The one I saw
(and did not fully digest), is about two and a half pages long.
And, to me, I couldn't see the motivations for using the
strategies in the proof.** These are not limited to regular polygons in general.
The equilateral triangle happens to also be regular.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since you don't want a proof I'll just say no!
 
biffboy said:
Since you don't want a proof I'll just say no!

From the problem statement, I would have (some type of past tense) gone with "yes."

I would have thought about the snake-like effect of the sides twisting around and what
I believed to be a decreasing net area.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top