Missing one equation to solve the linear system

In summary, a problem is posed in which a quadrilateral with one fixed side is rescaled along two other sides, and the coordinates of two points on the rescaled quadrilateral must be found such that the slope of the two rescaled sides is minimally changed. The length of the fourth side remains constant. The solution may involve rotating the points through the smallest angle, but it is possible that no solution exists.
  • #1
skrat
748
8

Homework Statement


So imagine 4 rigid rods connected together to form a dashed quadrilateral as shown in the picture.
IMG_20180704_211046.jpg

Now AB is fixed, can not be changed in anyway, while all other sides (AD, BC and CD) are connected but can move freely. The initial conditions (dashed quadrilateral) are given.
Now we rescale the dashed BC and AD sides to given values. Note that the length of CD remains constant!

Find coordinates of points C and D of newely generated quadrilateral in such way that the slope of AD and BC is minimally changed.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so the way I see the problem I have 4 values to determine
$$(x_C, y_C)\text{ and } (x_D, y_D).$$
First 3 (out of 4) equations are
$$ ||\vec{BC}|| = \sqrt{(x_C - x_B)^2 + (y_C - y_B)^2}$$
$$ ||\vec{AD}|| = \sqrt{(x_D - x_A)^2 + (y_D - y_A)^2}$$
$$ ||\vec{DC}|| = \sqrt{(x_C - x_D)^2 + (y_C - y_D)^2}$$

The forth one is the one I am struggling with. I know that the slope equals ##\tan \varphi = \frac{\Delta x}{\Delta y}## but I'm not really sure what to do with that. I'm quite sure I need to find the relation between ##\vartheta## and ##\varphi## first.

EDIT: This probably doesn't lead to a linear system of equations. I assume Lagrangian multiplier will be needed or some other method for finding multivariate extremes. I will kindly ask the moderators to change the topic title.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180704_211046.jpg
    IMG_20180704_211046.jpg
    25.1 KB · Views: 727
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
skrat said:
Now we rescale the dashed BC and AD sides to given values.
It's not clear what you mean by that.

in such way that the slope of AD and BC is minimally changed.
By the "slope of AD" , do you mean ##\tan (\theta)##? It isn't clear why ##\theta## would need to change at all when you "rescale" AD and BC.
 
  • #3
Stephen Tashi said:
It's not clear what you mean by that.
Lengthen. From ##||\vec {BC}||## to ##||\vec{BC}||'##.
Stephen Tashi said:
By the "slope of AD" , do you mean ##\tan (\theta)##? It isn't clear why ##\theta## would need to change at all when you "rescale" AD and BC.
Sorry, it is not clear. You are correct, ##\tan \vartheta## is not allowed to change when lengthening the sides. It's totally unnecessary to specifically point that out.
 
  • #4
skrat said:
Find coordinates of points C and D of newely generated quadrilateral in such way that the slope of AD and BC is minimally changed.
So by "minimally changed" you meant "unchanged"?
 
  • #5
vela said:
So by "minimally changed" you meant "unchanged"?
That would be amazing, but I don't see how that would be possible except in special cases.

Note that the length of CD is constant, while sides AD an BC are (except in special cases) NOT paralel. So from my understanding, the angles are unchanged if and only if AD and BC are parallel and if both of the sides are lengthen by the same amount.
 
  • #6
Ah, OK. I was thinking parallelogram instead of quadrilateral.

When you said ##\tan\theta## is not allowed to change in post #3, that's the same as saying the slope of BC can't change, but in the original post, you say the slope of BC can change.

If both ##\theta## and ##\phi## can change, what precisely do you mean by minimally changed?

When you talk about rescaling BC and AD, do you mean by the same factor, or could they change length independent of each other?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #7
vela said:
When you said ##\tan\theta## is not allowed to change in post #3, that's the same as saying the slope of BC can't change, but in the original post, you say the slope of BC can change.
Yeah that's a result of my bad english and poor problem statement.
So
1. We start with the dashed quadrilateral from the original post.
2. Then we rescale the BC and AD - almost never for the same factor, except in special cases. The BC side is rescaled along vector ##\hat{BC}## and AD along ##\hat{AD}##. So "the slope of BC and AD can't change" applies to this step ONLY. I think this is more clear now.
3. Since the AD and BC sides were lengthened (and since they are in general not parallel to each other), the length of CD is now either to long or to short - the OP says the length of CD has to remain constant - I have to rotate points C and D to change the distance between them. And I want to rotate them in such a way that the slope of BC and AD is minimally changed.

vela said:
If both ##\theta## and ##\phi## can change, what precisely do you mean by minimally changed?
That's the tricky part, left up to me to decide. Since ##\theta## and ##\phi## are not independent it might be sufficient to minimize their sum, if not, maybe sum of the squares of the slope, ...
If possible I would like to find an analytical solution to the problem, so the challenge is to find a condition that:
- minimally changes the shape of the quadrilateral (it was my interpretation that this means minimal change of the BC and AD slopes, maybe you have a better idea)
- possibly brings me to an analytical solution (but don't bother with that too much)
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #8
Anybody?
 
  • #9
skrat said:
minimally changes the shape of the quadrilateral (it was my interpretation that this means minimal change of the BC and AD slopes, maybe you have a better idea)
even if you fix on minimal change to slope, that is still open to imterpretation. How about rotation of each through the smallest angle, ψ (same angle for each but opposite directions)? Of course, there might be no such solution. Indeed, if one rod is extended much more than the other there may be no solution at all.
 

FAQ: Missing one equation to solve the linear system

What does it mean if a linear system is missing one equation?

Missing one equation in a linear system means that there is not enough information given to solve for all the variables. This can result in an infinite number of solutions or no solutions at all.

How do you know if a linear system is missing one equation?

You can tell if a linear system is missing one equation by counting the number of equations and the number of variables. If there are more variables than equations, then the system is missing an equation.

Can a linear system with one missing equation still have a unique solution?

No, a linear system with one missing equation cannot have a unique solution because there is not enough information to determine the values of all the variables. It can have either an infinite number of solutions or no solutions at all.

How do you solve a linear system with one missing equation?

To solve a linear system with one missing equation, you can use substitution or elimination methods. However, you will not be able to find a unique solution, so you will need to express the answer in terms of one or more variables.

Why is it important to have all the equations in a linear system?

It is important to have all the equations in a linear system because they provide the necessary information to solve for all the variables. Without all the equations, there is not enough information to determine a unique solution. In other words, having all the equations ensures that the system is not underdetermined.

Back
Top