Mistake in "Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory"?

In summary, the discussion revolves around a potential error identified in the textbook "Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory." The author or reviewers highlight specific inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the text, prompting a reevaluation of certain principles or equations presented in the book. This examination emphasizes the importance of accuracy in educational materials and the impact such mistakes can have on students' understanding of electromagnetic concepts.
  • #1
MatinSAR
612
188
Homework Statement
I guess there is a problem with this book in chapter 4.
Relevant Equations
Below.
The book wanna show how to find potential of a dielectric.
1705268734962.png

The problem arises when it uses a vector identity.
1705268822382.png

Still there is no problem.

1705268911641.png

My problem is that I cannot understand why ##\rho_P= -div P##? I think it should be ##-div' P##.
The book is wrong?

In next page it uses ##-div'##
1705269070906.png


In some other pages it uses ##div P## and this confuesd me ...
My professor didn't say anything about book being wrong in this chapter and I did not take a photo of class board. So I don't have any trusted source except here ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
P is a function of position. Inside the integral, one is integrating in prime coordinates, so P is a function of prime coordinates. The book is correct. It‘s just notation, not physics.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny and MatinSAR
  • #3
Frabjous said:
P is a function of position. Inside the integral, one is integrating in prime coordinates, so P is a function of prime coordinates. The book is correct. It‘s just notation, not physics.
Now I see what a poor question I've asked. Thanks @Frabjous .
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Frabjous
  • #4
Not a poor question. A simple and resolved question! 👍
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS and MatinSAR
  • #5
hutchphd said:
Not a poor question. A simple and resolved question! 👍
Thanks for your kind comment @hutchphd .
 
  • #6
The question was well stated and the answer was simple. If only this was always true! Consider the time you would have needlessly wasted had you not asked the question. Confusion almost always preceeds (useful) learning.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and MatinSAR
  • #7
hutchphd said:
Confusion almost always preceeds (useful) learning.
Any time I've ever succeded in figuring something out it was always preceded by a state of confusion.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR

FAQ: Mistake in "Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory"?

What is the nature of the mistake in "Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory"?

The mistake in "Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory" typically refers to an error in the mathematical derivation or conceptual explanation of a fundamental principle. These errors can range from incorrect application of Maxwell's equations to misinterpretations of boundary conditions or vector calculus operations.

How was the mistake in "Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory" discovered?

The mistake was often discovered by researchers or students who were rigorously studying the text and found inconsistencies between the theoretical predictions and experimental results, or through peer review and subsequent publications that identified and corrected the error.

What is the impact of the mistake on the field of electromagnetism?

The impact of the mistake can vary. In some cases, it might lead to minor confusion or misinterpretation among students and educators. In more severe cases, it could affect experimental designs or the development of new technologies. However, the scientific community usually addresses such mistakes quickly through errata, revised editions, and academic discourse.

Has the mistake been corrected in subsequent editions of the book?

Yes, mistakes identified in foundational texts like "Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory" are typically corrected in subsequent editions. Errata are published, and authors often provide clarifications and corrections to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the material.

What should students do if they encounter a mistake in a foundational textbook?

Students should first verify the mistake by consulting additional resources or discussing it with their instructors. If confirmed, they should refer to errata or revised editions of the textbook. Additionally, they can benefit from engaging with academic forums or contacting the authors for further clarification.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top