Modal mass and kinetic energy in FEM modal analysis

In summary, the conversation discusses a modal analysis of a simple beam using Ansys software. The requested modes are mass normalized, but the modal masses and kinetic energies are calculated with unit normalized modes. The effective mass is dependent on direction and can be computed by extracting the mass and stiffness matrix from Ansys and computing the eigenvectors. The modal mass and kinetic energy can be calculated using the formulas provided in the Ansys documentation. The conversation also mentions a mistake made by the individual regarding the normalization of the eigenvector.
  • #1
Arjan82
563
571
TL;DR Summary
What is the formula for modal mass and kinetic energy of a modal analysis FEM computation? I do *not* mean effective modal mass.
So, I use Ansys (well known FEM software) and get the next output for a modal analysis toy problem (If you happen to know Ansys that's a pre, but I promise it shouldn't matter). The problem is a simple beam, clamped at one end. I used 160 20-node brick elements to solve it (so no Timoshenko beams or something like that).

Ansys output:
 The modes requested are mass normalized (Nrmkey on MODOPT).  However, 
 the modal masses and kinetic energies below are calculated with unit 
 normalized modes.                                                     

        ***** MODAL MASSES, KINETIC ENERGIES, AND TRANSLATIONAL EFFECTIVE MASSES SUMMARY *****

                                                                         EFFECTIVE MASS
  MODE  FREQUENCY   MODAL MASS     KENE      |      X-DIR      RATIO%   Y-DIR      RATIO%   Z-DIR      RATIO%
     1   81.73       39.42      0.5199E+07   |     0.000        0.00   95.85       61.05   0.000        0.00
     2   159.3       40.53      0.2030E+08   |     0.000        0.00   0.000        0.00   96.07       61.19
     3   490.2       41.77      0.1981E+09   |     0.000        0.00   30.22       19.25   0.000        0.00
     4   593.4       31.73      0.2206E+09   |     0.000        0.00   0.000        0.00   0.000        0.00
     5   859.8       48.92      0.7138E+09   |     0.000        0.00   0.000        0.00   31.92       20.33
     6   1268.       77.93      0.2472E+10   |     126.6       80.61   0.000        0.00   0.000        0.00

So I know exactly how to get the effective mass, which is dependent on direction. And by exactly I mean exactly. I extract the mass and stiffness matrix from Ansys, compute the eigenvectors of this problem (with Matlab):

$$
\left[ K \right] \left\{ d \right\} = w \left[ M \right] \left\{ d \right\}
$$

with ##\left[ K \right] ## the stiffness matrix, ##\left[ M \right]## the mass matrix, ##\left\{ d \right\}## an eigenvector and ##w = \omega^2## the eigenvalue. All is 'mass normalized' such that ##\left\{ d \right\}^T \left[ M \right] \left\{ d \right\} = 1##. And now we can compute the participation factor for the x-direction (assuming mass normalization):

$$
L_x = \left\{ d \right\}^T \left[ M \right] \left\{ r_x \right\}
$$

with ##\left\{ r_x \right\}## the influence vector, or just a vector with 1's at all degrees of freedom of the x-direction and 0 everywhere else. And now the effective modal mass in the x-direction is simply ##L_x^2##. If I do this with e.g. Matlab I get exactly the same results as Ansys does (all digits are the same, except maybe the last). So, no problem there.

But the modal mass and kinetic energy (KENE) on the left side of this table are a mystery to me. I need the formula for that but cannot seem to find it, not in the documentation of Ansys, not on the internet (for which the results get swamped by explanations of effective mass) and not in any book about the subject I own. Who knows how to compute those numbers?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Allright, apparently the documentation of Ansys is also a mystery for me, the answer is just right in there 😆. Also, I'm overthinking things, as usual 🤔

The modal mass is simply

$$
m = \left\{ d \right\}^T \left[ M \right] \left\{ d \right\}
$$

And the kinetic energy

$$
KE = \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2
$$
 
  • #3
Oh, and crucially, the ##\left\{d\right\}## vector is not mass normalized, but unit normalized (i.e. the max absolute value of ##\left\{d\right\}## is equal to 1), otherwise ##m## would just be 1.
 
  • #4
How to get participations factors in a different co-ordinate system altogether?...The ANSYS output is always in global co-ordinate system. And, then you can get PF in X,Y,Z,Rx,Ry,Rz directions each. But, what if what I want to calculate PF in a locally defined co-ordinate system?
 

FAQ: Modal mass and kinetic energy in FEM modal analysis

What is modal mass in FEM modal analysis?

Modal mass in FEM modal analysis refers to the mass associated with each mode shape of a structure. It represents the portion of the total mass of the structure that participates in a specific mode of vibration.

How is modal mass calculated in FEM modal analysis?

Modal mass is calculated by performing a modal analysis using Finite Element Method (FEM) software. The software calculates the mass matrix for the structure and extracts the modal mass values corresponding to each mode shape.

What is the significance of modal mass in FEM modal analysis?

Modal mass is important in FEM modal analysis as it helps in understanding the dynamic behavior of a structure. It provides information about the distribution of mass in different mode shapes, which is crucial for predicting the response of the structure to external loads.

How is kinetic energy related to modal mass in FEM modal analysis?

Kinetic energy in FEM modal analysis is directly proportional to the modal mass. As modal mass represents the mass participating in a specific mode of vibration, the kinetic energy associated with that mode is influenced by the modal mass value.

Can modal mass and kinetic energy be used to optimize a structure's dynamic performance?

Yes, modal mass and kinetic energy can be used to optimize a structure's dynamic performance. By analyzing the distribution of modal mass and kinetic energy across different mode shapes, engineers can identify areas where mass can be added or removed to improve the structure's dynamic response.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
36K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top