Modernising Underpants - Sound Cancelling & Odour Retaining Tech

[wolram]

Thank you for the idea Ivan, i am not sure about this one though, i can see no dimensions,
any thing above 2inch dia? would be hard to sell.
I think i will stick with a flapper type sensor and electronic cancellation.

 

[turbo]

Thank you for the idea Ivan, i am not sure about this one though, i can see no dimensions,
any thing above 2inch dia? would be hard to sell.
I think i will stick with a flapper type sensor and electronic cancellation.

I am not so worried about the diameter (some people could accommodate that, apparently) but with the length of the silencer. Wimples are so "old school". Wow, have we reverse engineered some medieval social accessories? Maybe with some activated charcoal between the central tube and the shell... Darn! NASA's going to steal this one from us!

 

[LowlyPion]

Next thing you know we will be talking about gerbils.

 

[binzing]

The Mormons (LDS) wear long underwear that's been blessed at the Temple in Salt Lake so that they are "always carrying a piece of the Temple".

 

[Gokul43201]

I would appreciate if you guys could elaborate on the fact that pitch is inversly proportional to the square root of the mass of the butt cheeks. It seemed to me that another parameter is more relevant to the pitch actually, not even to mention the difference between chickpea and beer influence.

I was kidding about the mass of the cheeks! It's clearly not the vibrating cheeks that is the source of the sound but the escaping gas. So I would venture that the shape and size of the rectal opening is probably most relevant to pitch.

But I saw turbo's post and could pass up the opportunity to be a little ... anal.

 

[wolram]

NASA is way behind us, i mean where the heck would one fit a propeller

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984nasa.reptY...K

 

[edward]

Hmm is there any way the sound could be be converted into a tune? How about tiny embedded microphones that send the sound to a digital device that transforms the sound into different melodies for different people . It would be kind of like picking out your favorite ring tone.

 

[turbo]

Hmm is there any way the sound could be be converted into a tune? How about tiny embedded microphones that send the sound to a digital device that transforms the sound into different melodies for different people . It would be kind of like picking out your favorite ring tone.

What an idea! If you could have the sound of your farts converted into your boss' "Wham" ring tone and have him reach for the phone reflexively several times during a meeting... priceless.

 

[turbo]

"... before you go-go..."

 

[wolram]

No fair, this thread is a serious discussion about bringing underpants into the 21st century,
not creating another wind instrument.

 

[turbo]

No fair, this thread is a serious discussion about bringing underpants into the 21st century,
not creating another wind instrument.

hey! kazoo-type instruments have a loyal following. (although perhaps among aficionados that have restricted olfactory capabilities).

 

[signerror]

Ah yes ,what frequency does a G string vibrate at?

On A=440 equal temperament,

• 195.998 Hz for the violin and viola,
• 97.999 Hz for cello and double bass

Where each semitone is a multiplicative factor of 2^(1/12) ~= 1.059. Of course there are many alternative approaches,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical_tuning#Systems_for_the_twelve-note_chromatic_scale

which exist because the even chromatic tuning is imperfect (it does not preserve the classical, integral ratios of perfect intervals), and conversely any system based on perfect intervals is not invariant under transposition (almost the musical equivalent of Galilean invariance, it can be argued).

For example: if you try to map the frequency harmonics

1:2:3:4 (1=fundamental)

to the intervals 8ve, 5th, 4th respectively, you get ratios 2, 3/2, 4/3 for the respective intervals. Whereas, if you break the octave uniformly into twelve semitones, (logarithmic scale)

x^12 = 2 -> x = 2^(1/12)

So that the corresponding 5th is 2^(7/12) ~= 1.4983, and 4th is 2^(5/12) ~= 1.3348. Nothing works!

 

[turbo]

In fartology, the use of semiquavers in performance is frowned upon as "over the top" "common", and perhaps even "diva" behavior. Employing a farting pole to gain leverage in professional competitions is allowed, but is strictly regulated.

 

[wolram]

Well jest if you must, but i have all ready designed a reed valve type sensor, made from a flexible material that is washable, this sensor can even be retro fitted to ordinary underpants,
the only draw back is, it may make one walk a bit funny, so i am looking into some solid state device, may be optical, the only problem i have with that is if one sets off an anti noise while in normal motion.

 

[turbo]

So if you walk like a duck, and you talk like a duck...

 

[turbo]

Waaack! Waaack!

 

[turbo]

I just saw a Leno clip regarding a washable, reusable "flatulence deodorizer". We may have been scooped in regard to the olfactory effects, Woolie. Have to concentrate on mitigating the auditory effects.

 

[wolram]

I just saw a Leno clip regarding a washable, reusable "flatulence deodorizer". We may have been scooped in regard to the olfactory effects, Woolie. Have to concentrate on mitigating the auditory effects.

*#$#*#$#'s, i bet they were reading this thread and gazumped us, any way this morning i worked out how to stop the optical sensor from giving a false signal, it was simple, all i had to do was limit the low frequency response, so it all tied up with the fast amplitude response technology done.

 

[JulieEastern]

How can such a basic item of clothing be modernised you ask, well i have come up with an idea for sound cancelling underpants, the idea is to use upto date technology to capture sounds and produce an anti sound, and thus no one will have suffer embarrassment in meetings etc.
The only problem i have, is doing this in real time, this problem arises from the fact that the noise frequency can vary so much, so i will have to spend a lot of time making recordings . It may even be that each pair of underpants has to be tuned to the individual user, which will be a major disadvantage.
In the pipe line is odour retaining pants, but these are not looking promising, as so far they need to be at least 1/2 thick, and with people wanting to wear eye patches, i can not see how these could be packaged.

This is insane. You'll be wasting a lot of resources for a senseless purpose. Why not modernize the tailored suits instead to make it self cleaning no-wash garment. That way, you can save precious money for the laundry. I think there are already research conducted for that.

 

[mgb_phys]

Why not modernize the suits instead to make it self cleaning no-wash garment. That way, you can save precious money for the laundry. I think there are already research conducted for that.

Been done in korea http://articles.latimes.com/1999/feb/27/business/fi-12162