Moment of inertia and rotational kinetic energy

Click For Summary
To calculate the net work required to accelerate a merry-go-round from rest to a rotation rate of 1.00 revolutions per 8.00 seconds, the change in kinetic energy equation was used, resulting in 14,211.7 J. Initially, there was confusion regarding the use of torque, as the time to reach the final angular velocity was not known. It was pointed out that the correct variable for torque calculations should be Δθ instead of Δt. Alternative methods, such as using kinematics, were suggested to derive the work done, emphasizing the work-energy theorem as a simpler approach. Overall, the discussion focused on the correct application of physics equations to solve the problem efficiently.
pb23me
Messages
204
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A merry-go-round has a mass of 1640 kg and a radius of 7.50 m. How much net work is required to accelerate it from rest to a rotation rate of 1.00 revolutions per 8.00s? Assume it is a solid cylinder.


Homework Equations


\DeltaKE=Wnet=1/2(Iw2)=14211.7J
\tau=(\Deltaw/\Deltat)


The Attempt at a Solution

I tryed to get the answer by finding net torque first, but i didnt think i could find the net torque because i don't have the time that the merry go round goes from zero to w=.785rad/s.Then i just used the change in kinetic energy equation to get 14211.7J could i have found this answer the other way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pb23me said:
\DeltaKE=Wnet=1/2(Iw2)=14211.7J
\tau=(\Deltaw/\color{red}{\Delta}t)
You used the wrong variable! :-p It should be Δθ, not Δt

\tau = (ΔW)/(Δθ)​

The Attempt at a Solution

I tryed to get the answer by finding net torque first, but i didnt think i could find the net torque because i don't have the time that the merry go round goes from zero to w=.785rad/s.Then i just used the change in kinetic energy equation to get 14211.7J could i have found this answer the other way?

Yes. You could use kinematics if you wanted to. (But the work-energy theorem, which you ended up using in the end, is much easier.)

If you wanted to use kinematics, use the following equations:
  • W = \tau·θ (definition of work, assuming uniform torque)
  • \tau = (Newton's second law in angular terms)
  • ωf2 - ωi2 = 2αθ (one of your angular kinematics equations).
Combine the equations and solve for W. :smile: (Hint: if you keep everything in terms of variables, and solve for W before substituting in specific numbers, you'll get a pleasing result! :wink:)
 
thank you:smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K