Moment of inertia of a disc using rods as differential elements

  • #1
Hamiltonian
296
193
Homework Statement
find the moment of inertia of a disc using rods of variable lengths as differential element.(axis perpendicular to plane of disc and through its COM)
Relevant Equations
-
I know there are more convenient differential elements that can be chosen to compute the moment of inertia of a disc(like rings).

1621106503023.png

the mass of the differential element:

the moment of inertia of a rod through its COM is hency by applying the parallel axis theorem :



where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Looks like you set it up correctly. Are you sure you evaluated the integral correctly?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Hamiltonian
  • #3
I agree with @TSny , the integral is not correctly performed.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian
  • #4
TSny said:
Looks like you set it up correctly. Are you sure you evaluated the integral correctly?




i used wolfram alpha to do it now i am getting the correct answer thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes TSny
  • #5
Hamiltonian299792458 said:




i used wolfram alpha to do it now i am getting the correct answer thanks!
Note that solving the integral involves a trig substitution which effectively converts it to having chosen the more sensible differential element in the first place. Is that a useful exercise?
Perhaps it is a lesson that when a trig substitution helps with an integral one should consider what it means in terms of the original analysis.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Steve4Physics, Hamiltonian, Delta2 and 1 other person
  • #6
haruspex said:
Note that solving the integral involves a trig substitution which effectively converts it to having chosen the more sensible differential element in the first place. Is that a useful exercise?
Perhaps it is a lesson that when a trig substitution helps with an integral one should consider what it means in terms of the original analysis.
The original homework statement specifically requires use of "rods of variable lengths as differential element".

Is there a better approach than that used by the OP? Am I missing something obvious?

Edited - typo'.
 
  • #7
Steve4Physics said:
The original homework statement specifically requires use of "rods of variable lengths as differential element".

Is there a better approach than that used by the OP? Am I missing something obvious?

Edited - typo'.
you could use the differentiable elements as rings.


the moment of inertia of a ring is



the resulting integral is much simpler in this case
 
  • #8
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
you could use the differentiable elements as rings.


the moment of inertia of a ring is



the resulting integral is much simpler in this case
Yes, I know! (And in Post #1, you'd already mentioned that you realized this.)

But the original homework asks for an analysis in terms of 'rods'. Whoever set the homework specifically didn't want you to use rings - presumably to make the exercise a little more demanding.

I was pointing out that your method is the only one (as faras I can see) that properly answers the original question. So don't be tempted to hand-in a solution based on the ring method, except perhaps as an addendum to demonstrate that you know that this is better approach.
 
  • #9
Steve4Physics said:
The original homework statement specifically requires use of "rods of variable lengths as differential element".

Is there a better approach than that used by the OP? Am I missing something obvious?

Edited - typo'.
I'm sure the OP approach satisfies the given requirement in the way the setter expected. Just pointing out that the algebra can't help but switch to the standard route under the covers. I don't think there's a way to avoid it.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
Back
Top