Momentum of photon close the sun or black hole

[exponent137]

Thanks.
Now the next question:
How tiny fractions of momentum the photon is giving to the sun? Here the principle of uncertainty comes in play.
I calculated a formula

If delta(L) is recalculated in delta(phi) and we respect tiny changes of momentum

delta(phi) ^3 >= Rs * lambda/(2pi Rb)

Rb is the radius of sun as black hole = 3E3 m (only for a short record.)
Rs is the radius of the sun = 7E8 m.
lamba is a wave lenght, for instance 3E-7 m.
delta(phi) is change of angle around the sun.
delta(L) is change of photons path, where principle of uncertainty is still valid.
This is not small angle (1.5e-2 rad)
But if we include radio waves, this angle become close to 2 pi.

So, how it is with the principle of uncertainty in this example.

 

[Jonathan Scott]

Thanks.
Now the next question:
How tiny fractions of momentum the photon is giving to the sun? Here the principle of uncertainty comes in play.
I calculated a formula

If delta(L) is recalculated in delta(phi) and we respect tiny changes of momentum

delta(phi) ^3 >= Rs * lambda/(2pi Rb)

Rb is the radius of sun as black hole = 3E3 m (only for a short record.)
Rs is the radius of the sun = 7E8 m.
lamba is a wave lenght, for instance 3E-7 m.
delta(phi) is change of angle around the sun.
delta(L) is change of photons path, where principle of uncertainty is still valid.
This is not small angle (1.5e-2 rad)
But if we include radio waves, this angle become close to 2 pi.

So, how it is with the principle of uncertainty in this example.

Sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about. Mixing QM and gravity rarely makes sense anyway, but I don't even know what you are trying to say.

 

[exponent137]

Sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about.

According to general relativity, a photon gives its momentum to sun continuously. So, on a very short path it gives very small momentum to sun. But this is in contradiction with the principle of uncertainty. So I calculated the smallest rates of momentum, which are given by the photon and these rates are much larger than in the area of Planck's distances.
If this is not enough, I can explain derivation more precisely...