Monopole Creation and Higgs Field

In summary, Guth explains that the creation of magnetic monopoles is a result of the failure to achieve universal alignment of Higgs fields after the phase transition. This failure to align can create defects, such as domain walls, which can lead to the formation of monopoles. If universal alignment had occurred, there would be no monopoles.
  • #1
expos4ever
21
5
Please consider this statement from Alan Guth (from his book "The Inflationary Universe"). The context is the creation of magnetic monopoles:

The monopoles, therefore, are the surviving remnants of the chaos in the Higgs fields immediately after the phase transition.

Guth then goes on to present an argument to the effect that Higgs fields tend to 'align' with one another over time - thereby eliminating this 'chaos' - but only to the extent permitted by the speed limit of light: the Higgs field at location A cannot align with the Higgs field at location B by a time t if a ray of light cannot get from A to B in t seconds or less. I get this last bit about effects not propagating faster than c.

The thrust of the argument seems to be that failure to achieve universal alignment resulted in monopole creation (loosely: some regions of space were too far apart from each other to be able to align given the speed of light limit). Conversely, if universal alignment had occurred, there should be no monopoles.

Can anyone present a comprehensible explanation as to why this failure to achieve alignment should give birth to monopoles?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
expos4ever said:
Please consider this statement from Alan Guth (from his book "The Inflationary Universe"). The context is the creation of magnetic monopoles:

The monopoles, therefore, are the surviving remnants of the chaos in the Higgs fields immediately after the phase transition.

Guth then goes on to present an argument to the effect that Higgs fields tend to 'align' with one another over time - thereby eliminating this 'chaos' - but only to the extent permitted by the speed limit of light: the Higgs field at location A cannot align with the Higgs field at location B by a time t if a ray of light cannot get from A to B in t seconds or less. I get this last bit about effects not propagating faster than c.

The thrust of the argument seems to be that failure to achieve universal alignment resulted in monopole creation (loosely: some regions of space were too far apart from each other to be able to align given the speed of light limit). Conversely, if universal alignment had occurred, there should be no monopoles.

Can anyone present a comprehensible explanation as to why this failure to achieve alignment should give birth to monopoles?
Magnetic monopoles can form when there is a "defect".

I think the easiest defect to understand is to consider the above situation, where A and B are both regions of aligned Higgs fields which began separately, but later collided. The two-dimensional boundary between the two regions becomes stuck in a higher-energy state. This kind of defect is known as a "domain wall".

In principle you can have a defect of any number of dimensions. A one-dimensional defect is known as a cosmic string. A magnetic monopole is a zero-dimensional defect.

For a little bit more on defects:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_defect
 
  • Like
Likes expos4ever

FAQ: Monopole Creation and Higgs Field

1. What is a monopole and how is it created?

A monopole is a hypothetical particle with a single magnetic pole, either north or south, as opposed to the dipoles found in regular magnets. It is created through a process known as symmetry breaking, where the Higgs field acquires a non-zero value and breaks the symmetry of the universe.

2. What is the role of the Higgs field in monopole creation?

The Higgs field is responsible for giving particles their mass through the Higgs mechanism. In the case of monopole creation, the Higgs field plays a role in breaking the symmetry of the universe, allowing for the creation of monopoles.

3. Can monopoles be created naturally or only through experiments?

Currently, there is no evidence of monopoles existing in nature. They are only created through experiments, such as high-energy collisions in particle accelerators, as they require extremely high energy levels to be produced.

4. What implications does the existence of monopoles have on our understanding of physics?

If monopoles are ever discovered, it would have significant implications on our understanding of the universe and the laws of physics. It could potentially lead to new theories and models that better explain the fundamental interactions between particles.

5. Are there any practical applications for monopoles?

While monopoles have not been discovered yet, there have been some proposed practical applications if they do exist. These include their potential use in magnetic monopole motors and generators, as well as in data storage devices.

Similar threads

Back
Top