Multiplication of Operators in Quantum Mechanics

  • Thread starter Penny57
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Homework
In summary, "Multiplication of Operators in Quantum Mechanics" discusses the mathematical framework for combining quantum operators, which represent physical observables. It explains how operators can be multiplied, the implications for the uncertainty principle, and the significance of non-commuting operators in quantum theory. The text emphasizes the role of operator multiplication in determining the evolution of quantum states and highlights the importance of understanding the algebra of operators for solving quantum mechanical problems.
  • #1
Penny57
7
3
Homework Statement
Operators can also be multiplied just like matrices. Physically, this represents applying two operations in succession. To compute in the abstract setting, we just need the rule ⟨i|j⟩ = δij .

(d) Compute the operator product of |1⟩⟨1| and |1⟩⟨1| + |2⟩⟨2|.
(e) Compute the operator product of |1⟩⟨2| + |2⟩⟨1| and |2⟩⟨2|.
Relevant Equations
O = O[SUB]ij[/SUB] |i⟩⟨j| = O[SUB]11[/SUB] * |1⟩⟨1| + O[SUB]12[/SUB] * |1⟩⟨2| + O[SUB]21[/SUB]|2⟩⟨1| + O[SUB]22[/SUB]|2⟩⟨2|.
For the first part of the problem, I managed to form this matrix;

<1|O|1><1|O|2>
<2|O|1><2|O|2>

=
10
00

However, that was because I was following this image;

MUuW2cj.png


I'm not entirely sure how this was obtained, and I'm not really sure what to do to continue forward with part e. I apologize for my lack of knowledge - I've attempted to search for any youtube videos to help and go through online textbooks, but I'm unable to find what I am looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why don't you investigate it with the expression of the states

 
Last edited:
  • #3
penny_ss said:
To compute in the abstract setting, we just need the rule ⟨i|j⟩ = δij .
For example, the operator multiplied by the operator would be The middle part of the expression on the far right can be evaluated using the rule .
 
  • #4
Thank you so much for the help! I've managed to work through it with the advice given. I forgot to account for the expression of the states - once I did, the problem became much easier. Thank you for the help! And that rule makes a lot more sense now. Thank you again!
 
Back
Top