MHB Multiplying in Z/mZ: Solving m=3 & m=7 Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about multiplying in Z/mZ for m=3 and m=7, it is established that Z/mZ is a field when m is prime. Specifically, for m=7, the structure is confirmed as a field because there are no divisors of zero, which is proven through the relationship between multiples and prime factors. The discussion also provides examples of multiplicative inverses in Z/7Z, illustrating the field properties. In contrast, m=3 is similarly treated, reinforcing that both cases involve prime numbers, thus confirming their status as fields. The key takeaway is that Z/mZ is a field if m is prime, with practical examples provided for clarity.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote a question from Yahoo! Answers

Multiply in Z\mZ question: m= 3, 7 also which m is Z/mZ a field? m=7? m=3? show some steps.?
multiply in Z\mZ
question: m= 3, 7 also which m is Z/mZ a field?
m=7?
m=3?

I have given a link to the topic there so the OP can see my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I suppose you want to prove that if $m$ prime, then $\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}$ is a field. For all $m\geq 2$ integer, we know that $\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}=\{\bar{0},\bar{1},\ldots,\overline{m-1}\}$ is a finite, conmutative and unitary ring. But we also know that a finite integral domain is a field, so we only need to prove that if $m$ prime, there are no divisors of zero.

Suppose $\bar{k}\bar{s}=\bar{0}$, then $ks$ is multiple of $m$ or equivalently $m|ks$. If $m$ prime, $m|k$ or $m|s$ which implies $\bar{k}=\bar{0}$ or $\bar{s}=\bar{0}$.

For example, in the particular case $m=7$ the inverses are
$$(\bar{1})^{-1}=\bar{1},\;(\bar{2})^{-1}=\bar{4},\;(\bar{3})^{-1}=\bar{5},\;(\bar{4})^{-1}=\bar{2},\;(\bar{5})^{-1}=\bar{3},\;(\bar{6})^{-1}=\bar{6}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top