MHB Multiplying Radicals: Where Is My Mistake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cuberoot1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radicals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a misunderstanding in multiplying radicals, specifically the expression (7-sqrt3a)(7+sqrt3a). The correct approach utilizes the difference of squares formula, which states that (a-b)(a+b) equals a^2-b^2. The user initially attempted to expand the expression incorrectly, leading to an erroneous result. The correct calculation should yield 49 - 3a, rather than the user's result of 49 + 3a - 14sqrt3a. This highlights the importance of applying the correct algebraic identities when working with radicals.
Cuberoot1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I did this problem on paper but my calculator doesn't agree with the result. Can somebody tell me where I'm going wrong and how to do it right?

(7-sqrt3a)(7+sqrt3a)
= (7-sqrt3a)7+(7-sqrt3a)sqrt3a
= (7•7-7sqrt3a)+(7sqrt3a-sqrt3asqrt3a)
= 49-7sqrt3a+7sqrt3a-3a
= 49+3a-14sqrt3a

Even before I used the calculator something looked wrong, but I can't figure out how to fix it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cuberoot said:
I did this problem on paper but my calculator doesn't agree with the result. Can somebody tell me where I'm going wrong and how to do it right?

(7-sqrt3a)(7+sqrt3a)
= (7-sqrt3a)7+(7-sqrt3a)sqrt3a
= (7•7-7sqrt3a)+(7sqrt3a-sqrt3asqrt3a)
= 49-7sqrt3a+7sqrt3a-3a
= 49+3a-14sqrt3a

Even before I used the calculator something looked wrong, but I can't figure out how to fix it.

(Wave)

$$(7-\sqrt{3a})(7+\sqrt{3a})=7 \cdot 7+ 7 \sqrt{3a}-7 \sqrt{3a}-(\sqrt{3a})^2=49-(\sqrt{3}a)^2$$
In general, it is known that $(a-b)(a+b)=a^2-b^2$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top