Multipole Expansion: Show that the quadrupole moment is symmetric and that the trace vanished

  • #1
Lambda96
204
72
Homework Statement
Show that the quadrupole moment is symmetric and that the trace vanished
Relevant Equations
none
Hi

i have problems, to solve task a)

Bildschirmfoto 2024-11-02 um 19.10.31.png

Since I have to calculate the trace of the matrix ##Q##, I started as follows:

$$\text{trace} (Q)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}\int_{}^{}d^3x'(3x_i^{'2}-r^{'2}) \rho(x')$$

I then calculated further until I got the following form:

$$\text{trace} (Q)=\int_{}^{}d^3x' \cdot 2x'^{2} \rho(x')$$

Now I'm stuck because I don't know how to show that the expression is 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Lambda96 said:
$$\text{trace} (Q)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}\int_{}^{}d^3x'(3x_i^{'2}-r^{'2}) \rho(x')$$

I then calculated further until I got the following form:

$$\text{trace} (Q)=\int_{}^{}d^3x' \cdot 2x'^{2} \rho(x')$$
In getting to the second equation above, you made a mistake when evaluating ## \sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}r^{'2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96
  • #3
TSny said:
In getting to the second equation above, you made a mistake when evaluating ## \sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}r^{'2}##.
I think the mistake is in dropping the subscript and writing ##x'^2## in OP's expression for the trace. What does that even mean?
(I deleted my post because it went in an unnecessary direction.)
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96
  • #4
kuruman said:
I think the mistake is in dropping the subscript and writing ##x'^2## in OP's expression for the trace. What does that even mean?
I interpreted the OP's ##x'^2## to mean the same as ##r'^2##.

I tried to guess how the OP got the incorrect factor of ##2x'^2##. The sum over ##i## of ##3{x'_i}^2## gives ##3r'^2##. Then I guessed that the OP just subtracted the ##r'^2## in the expression to get ##2r'^2## which they wrote as ##2x'^2##. But, I shouldn't have done all this guessing! Bad form on my part. :blushing:

Hopefully, the OP will clarify what they did.
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman
  • #5
Hint: ##(3x^2 - r^2 ) + (3y^2 - r^2) + (3z^2 - r^2) ## equals what?
 
  • Like
Likes TSny and Lambda96
  • #6
Thank you TSny, kuruman and PhDeezNutz for your help 👍👍👍

You are right TSny :smile: I proceeded as follows:

I interpreted ##r'^2## as follows:

$$r'^2=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}{x'}_i \cdot {x'}_i=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}{x'^2}_i={x'^2}_1+{x'^2}_2+{x'^2}_3$$

Then I calculated the following

$$\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} \int_{}^{}d^3x'(3{x'^2}_i-{x'^2}_i) p(x’)$$
$$\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} \int_{}^{}d^3x'\cdot 2{x'^2}_i p(x')$$
$$\int_{}^{}d^3x'\cdot 2({x'^2}_1+{x'^2}_2+{x'^2}_3) p(x')$$
$$\int_{}^{}d^3x'\cdot 2{x’^2} p(x')$$

In the end I should have written ##{r’}^2## instead of ##{x'}^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny
  • #7
I strongly suggest you write out the terms in the sum explicitly. There’s only 3.

The first term is

##3{x’}_1^2 - r^2## where ##r^2 = {x’}_1^2 + {x’}_2^2 + {x’}_3^2##

Write out the next two terms and sum all 3 terms together. What do you realize?

@Lambda96 post is fixed now.

I think I see what you are doing and while it is valid I don't think it's the best approach. Simplify at the end when you have written out all terms and summed them instead of trying to prove each term is zero ( I think that's what you're trying to do). Think about it this way; if the trace is ##0## regardless of charge distribution then the (entire) integrand (after you have summed) has to be categorically ##0##.

Long and short of it: bring the sum inside the integral.

Don't prove the integral is zero by integrating each term.

Prove the integral is zero by proving the integrand is zero.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lambda96
  • #8
Thank you PhDeezNutz for your help 👍

Do you mean the following?

$$=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} \int_{}^{}d^3x'(3{x'^2}_i-{r'}^2) p(x’)$$
$$=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} \int_{}^{}d^3x'(3{x'^2}_i-{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_3) p(x’)$$
$$=\int_{}^{}d^3x'(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} 3{x'^2}_i-{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_3) p(x’)$$
$$=\int_{}^{}d^3x'(3{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_3+3{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_3+3{x'^2}_3-{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_3) p(x’)$$
$$=\int_{}^{}d^3x'(3{x'^2}_1+3{x'^2}_2+3{x'^2}_3-3{x'^2}_1-3{x'^2}_2-3{x'^2}_3) p(x’)$$
$$=\int_{}^{}d^3x'0 p(x’)$$
$$=0$$
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
  • #9
More simply you change the order of summation and integration and then work on the summation to write $$\begin{align} & \sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} (3{x'^2}_i-{r'}^2)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} (3{x'^2}_i)-\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} ({r'}^2)\nonumber \\
& =3\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} ({x'^2}_i)-({r'}^2)\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}1=3({r'}^2)-({r'}^2)\times 3=0. \nonumber
\end{align}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96 and PhDeezNutz
  • #10
That’s exactly what I meant. Good Job.
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96 and kuruman
  • #11
Thank you kuruman and PhDeezNutz for your help 👍👍
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz

FAQ: Multipole Expansion: Show that the quadrupole moment is symmetric and that the trace vanished

What is a multipole expansion?

A multipole expansion is a mathematical technique used in physics and engineering to describe the potential field generated by a distribution of charges or mass. It expresses the potential as a series of terms, each corresponding to a different "pole" (monopole, dipole, quadrupole, etc.), allowing for a simplified analysis of complex systems by focusing on the dominant contributions at large distances from the source.

What is the quadrupole moment?

The quadrupole moment is a measure of the distribution of charge or mass in a system that goes beyond the monopole and dipole moments. It describes how the charge or mass is distributed in a way that can create a non-uniform field, particularly in systems where the dipole moment is zero. Mathematically, the quadrupole moment tensor is a rank-2 tensor that encapsulates this information, and it is essential for understanding the behavior of systems in external fields.

How is the quadrupole moment defined mathematically?

The quadrupole moment tensor \( Q_{ij} \) is defined in terms of the charge distribution \( \rho(\mathbf{r}) \) as follows: \[ Q_{ij} = \int \rho(\mathbf{r}) (3x_ix_j - r^2 \delta_{ij}) dV \]where \( x_i \) and \( x_j \) are the coordinates, \( r^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \), \( \delta_{ij} \) is the Kronecker delta, and the integral is taken over the entire volume of the charge distribution. This formulation captures the symmetric nature of the quadrupole moment tensor.

Why is the quadrupole moment symmetric?

The quadrupole moment tensor is symmetric because it is derived from the product of the coordinates, which inherently leads to symmetry in the indices. Specifically, \( Q_{ij} = Q_{ji} \) due to the structure of the integral and the nature of the terms involved. This symmetry reflects the physical idea that the distribution of charge or mass does not prefer a specific orientation in the coordinate system, making the quadrupole moment a symmetric tensor.

Why does the trace of the quadrupole moment vanish?

The trace of the quadrupole moment tensor, given by \( \text{Tr}(Q) = Q_{ii} \), vanishes because the definition of the quadrupole moment includes a term that subtracts the isotropic part of the distribution. Specifically, the trace is computed as:\[ \text{Tr}(Q) = \int \rho(\mathbf{r}) (3r^2 - r^2) dV = 2 \int \rho

Back
Top