- #36
- 7,861
- 1,600
Since I'm not the only person who uses the terminology "signal", I'm willing to accept a technical definition of what others mean by it. My questions are: What is that technical definition? Does it apply in contexts where there are no waves? If so, how is that definition stated without reference to a wave?sophiecentaur said:What do you mean by "a signal"?
Perhaps - and we'd have to give a technical definition for "information".I think that could be the problem because you would need to specify how much 'information' constitutes a signal.
I have a suspicion that you may, at this stage, just be trying to find something inadequate in received Science.
I don't understand exactly what you mean.
If you are saying that I'm trying to point out something inadequate and paradoxical about known science, that isn't the case. I genuinely don't know if conventional science has a way of giving a technical defintion for the intuitive notion of the propagation speed of a disturbance without referring to the concept of waves.