Natural Group Homomorphism in Action

  • Thread starter Thread starter ti89fr33k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Natural
Click For Summary
Natural group homomorphism refers to a map between groups that maintains their structural properties. The term "natural" relates to a specific category theoretic definition, which may not be crucial for basic understanding. An example includes the homomorphism from the integers (Z) to the integers modulo p (Zp), illustrating how group maps can induce other maps. The discussion highlights the naturality property, where a map from Z to a group G leads to an induced map from Z/n to G, preserving composition. This property demonstrates the inherent consistency and utility of homomorphisms in group theory.
ti89fr33k
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
What is it, and can you give me a few examples of how its used?

Thanks,
Mary
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A homomorphism is simply a map between groups that respects the groupiness of the groups. (I don't know why Natural is there, that has a specific category theoretic definition that isn't necessary at this stage.)

I don't follow what you mean by "used". I could tell you abuot the properties of homomorphisms that are important. We just find them useful. I mean what's the "use" of a surjection, and injection, addition, division. Perhaps if you explain waht you wanted to know in terms of how you "use" those then we could say more. 1
 
Maybe by "natural" he means something like the projection G --> G/K?

One example you've probably used quite a bit is the homomorphism from Z to Zp that maps an integer to the corresponding integer mod p.
 
heres a little example comprising both matt's categorical point and hurkyls example.

suppose you have a group map from Z to a group G and suppose that n goes to the identity e. then there is an induced map from Z/n to G such that the composition

Z-->Z/n-->G equals the original map Z-->G.

this is a naturality property of the map Z/n-->G.

Another one is that if G-->H is another group homomorphism, then n will still go to e under the composition Z-->G-->H, and the natrual map Z/n--H will equal the composition Z/n-->G-->H.

the fact that the construction of the map Z/n-->(anything), [factoring the map Z-->(anything)], behaves well under composition, is the categorical naturality property.

It is so natural that I did not bother to check it here, it just has to be true.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
519
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
845
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
870
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K