Navier-Stokes solutions: Beltrami flow

In summary, "Navier-Stokes solutions: Beltrami flow" discusses a specific type of fluid flow characterized by a velocity field that is both divergence-free and curl-free, known as Beltrami flow. The paper explores mathematical properties and implications of such flows within the framework of the Navier-Stokes equations, which govern fluid dynamics. It highlights the significance of Beltrami flows in understanding the existence and uniqueness of solutions to these equations, as well as their relevance to theoretical and applied fluid mechanics.
  • #1
casparov
30
6
TL;DR Summary
Question on viscosity with Beltrami flow
There are some known solutions for 3D Navier-Stokes such as Beltrami flow.
In the literature these Beltrami flow solutions are said to not take into account viscosity, however when I read the information on Beltrami flow, they do seem to involve (kinematic) viscosity:

From incompressible vorticity eq,

{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {\omega }}}{\partial t}}+(\mathbf {v} \cdot \nabla ){\boldsymbol {\omega }}-({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot \nabla )\mathbf {v} =\nu \nabla ^{2}{\boldsymbol {\omega }}+\nabla \times f,}


and because w and v are parallel,
{\displaystyle (\mathbf {v} \cdot \nabla ){\boldsymbol {\omega }}=({\boldsymbol {\omega }}\cdot \nabla )\mathbf {v} =0}
, yields a linear DE

{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {\omega }}}{\partial t}}=\nu \nabla ^{2}{\boldsymbol {\omega }}+\nabla \times f.}

Which is satisfied with Beltrami flow. With nu the kinematic viscosity and f an external force.

Is the problem the linearization ?
Also, might the necessary viscosity also not be modelled through a suitable "external" force expression?

Can someone explain why Beltrami flows are considered inviscid solutions ?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top