Need help to arrive at a formula/equation

  • Thread starter malzki
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses a problem with simulating a program for a scale that measures the weight of liquids in a container. The goal is to get an estimated weight with an accuracy of -5% to +5% within 500 ms. However, the weight is unstable for the first few seconds due to vibrations caused by placing the container on the scale. The group discusses using simple harmonic motion and critical damping to estimate the weight, but more information is needed to find a solution. They also suggest using a heavy scale or finding ways to reduce the effects of vibration.
  • #1
malzki
3
0
Hello everybody!
I hope you could help me with my problem.
I am trying to simulate a program for a scale that measures the weight of liquids in a bottle or in a container.
After placing the container in the scale, i need to get an estimated weight (with accuracy of -5% to +5%) within 500 ms.
Placing the container on the scale generates vibration and weight is unstable for the first few seconds.
Do you have any idea how can i get an estimated weight of the object that i placed on the scale?
I think this is related and somewhat similar to spring equations but i don't know exactly what equation or solution to use.
I appreciate any help that you can give.


malzki
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Assume that the scale acts as a spring, and for the first few seconds, the object placed on the scale undergoes simple harmonic motion. At this point, if what I've said doesn't help, then I'd need more information. What kind of readings do you know about the scale. If you wanted, could you get the spring co-efficient for the scale? What other information do you have at your disposal, so far I don't think there's enough information to answer your question.
 
  • #3
Just curious...why should one want to take the reading of the weight when the reading on the scale is unstable? Why not wait until the reading gets stable? I think for a good scale there should be enough "damping" such that the reading gets stable very quickly?

Or rather would you want to use "simple harmonic motion" to estimate the inertial mass of a liquid? (i.e. attach a spring to the cup of liquid and set it into motion and take some readings)
 
  • #4
Wong said:
Or rather would you want to use "simple harmonic motion" to estimate the inertial mass of a liquid? (i.e. attach a spring to the cup of liquid and set it into motion and take some readings)

Yes, this is similar to what i want to do.
By the way, it seems that my problem is vibration and other factors that affect the weight of some objects on a scale. And this is especially for objects that i need to weigh precisely (example, my scale is graduated in 0.01 gram).
I also appreciate if you can suggest me solutions to lessen the effect of vibration.
Thank you for your posts.
 
  • #5
Get a really heavy scale.
 
  • #6
Someone mentioned damping, and I would suggest if this is a theoretical experiment that you think of that, the mass starts with potential energy which unless lossed by some mechanism would keep an idealised scale moving forever. Natural scales have losses but they may not be enough , the solution is to create 'critical' damping where the mass moves smoothly with a very small overshoot -- there is a maths expression for such but I cannot remember what it is. Ray
In this scenario the first overshoot( and there is only one ) is equal to your error allowance.
I remember now it's a simple Bessel expression for simple harmonic motion with critical damping ( assumes small deviations hence linear) you need to develop an equation of motion in which a force exists dependant upon velocity
obviously this disappears when the mass comes to rest, and is largest as the mass is accellerated to it's greatest speed. IT's equivalent to a term involving dx/dt in the diff equation d^2(x)/dt^2 + k dx/dt + a =0 , if k=0 the system is undamped and results in sinusoidal motions.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
thanks for your replies.
i'll inform you of the results soon. :)
 

FAQ: Need help to arrive at a formula/equation

How do I determine the variables needed for my formula?

The first step in creating a formula is to identify the variables that are relevant to the problem you are trying to solve. This may involve doing some research and gathering data. Once you have a list of variables, you can start to think about how they are related and what type of equation or formula would best represent that relationship.

What is the difference between a formula and an equation?

A formula is a mathematical relationship or rule that describes the relationship between different variables. An equation, on the other hand, is a statement that shows the equality between two expressions. In other words, a formula is a type of equation, but not all equations are formulas.

How do I test my formula for accuracy?

Once you have derived a formula, it is important to test it to ensure that it accurately represents the relationship between the variables. You can do this by plugging in different values for the variables and comparing the results with real-world data or known solutions. If there are any discrepancies, you may need to revise your formula.

Can I use a formula to make predictions?

Yes, formulas can be used to make predictions based on the relationships between variables. However, it is important to remember that a formula is only as accurate as the data and assumptions used to create it. Therefore, it is important to test and validate your formula before using it for predictions.

Are there any common mistakes to avoid when creating a formula?

One common mistake when creating a formula is using incorrect or incomplete data. It is important to thoroughly research and gather all relevant data before attempting to create a formula. Additionally, it is important to clearly define the variables and their relationships to avoid any confusion or errors in the formula.

Similar threads

Back
Top