Need help with an integral -- How to integrate velocity squared?

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem with an implicit function integral and the difficulties in solving it without knowing the initial function. The chain rule is mentioned as a potential solution, but it only works for systems with a first order ODE. It is suggested to approach the problem by considering the energy dissipation term.
  • #1
Tomder
4
1
TL;DR Summary
Problem with a implicit function integral.
The integral is this one:

##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt,##

With ##x=x(t). ##

I don't know how to solve that integral and I haven't find nothing to read about on how to proceed with this kind of (implicit function?) integrals without having the initial function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=integral+(y'(x))^2+dx+=
suggests that it is likely there exists no closed form for the integral.

What's also suspicious: if you take standard units, then you ask for a quantity measured in ##\dfrac{m^2}{s}## and I cannot think of where this might make sense.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Tomder said:
TL;DR Summary: Problem with a implicit function integral.

The integral is this one:

##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt,##

With ##x=x(t). ##

I don't know how to solve that integral and I haven't find nothing to read about on how to proceed with this kind of (implicit function?) integrals without having the initial function.

By the chain rule: [tex]\int \dot x^2\,dt = \int \dot x \frac{dx}{dt}\,dt = \int \dot x \,dx.[/tex] But this only helps you if you know [itex]\dot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex], ie. your system satisfies a first order ODE. But you originally asked this question in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE [tex]
\ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x.[/tex] In that case you do not have [itex]\dot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex]; you have [itex]\ddot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]\dot x[/itex]. You can't evaluate[itex]\int \dot x^2 \,dt[/itex] unless you already know [itex]x(t)[/itex] and [itex]\dot x(t)[/itex]. What you can say is that [tex]
\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac12 \dot x^2 + \int f(x)\,dx \right) = -k\dot x^2 \leq 0,[/tex] ie. the system dissipates energy.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff, PeroK, Tomder and 1 other person
  • #4
pasmith said:
By the chain rule: [tex]\int \dot x^2\,dt = \int \dot x \frac{dx}{dt}\,dt = \int \dot x \,dx.[/tex] But this only helps you if you know [itex]\dot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex], ie. your system satisfies a first order ODE. But you originally asked this question in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE [tex]
\ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x.[/tex] In that case you do not have [itex]\dot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex]; you have [itex]\ddot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]\dot x[/itex]. You can't evaluate[itex]\int \dot x^2 \,dt[/itex] unless you already know [itex]x(t)[/itex] and [itex]\dot x(t)[/itex]. What you can say is that [tex]
\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac12 \dot x^2 + \int f(x)\,dx \right) = -k\dot x^2 \leq 0,[/tex] ie. the system dissipates energy.
Thanks, I thought about the same process but was unsure of its veracity, guess I‘ll try to work in my system with the idea of energy dissipation term. Thank you very much for your answer.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK

FAQ: Need help with an integral -- How to integrate velocity squared?

1. What is the formula for integrating velocity squared?

The integral of velocity squared, denoted as ∫v² dt, can be calculated using the basic rules of integration. If v is a function of time, you can express the integral as ∫(v(t))² dt. The specific result will depend on the form of the function v(t).

2. How do I approach integrating velocity squared if I have a specific function for velocity?

If you have a specific function for velocity, such as v(t) = at + b (where a and b are constants), you can substitute this function into the integral: ∫(at + b)² dt. Then, expand the integrand and integrate term by term.

3. What are the units of the result when integrating velocity squared?

The units of the integral of velocity squared will be in terms of distance cubed per time squared (e.g., m³/s² if using SI units). This is because velocity has units of distance per time (m/s), and squaring it gives m²/s², which, when integrated with respect to time, results in m³/s².

4. Can I use numerical methods to integrate velocity squared if the function is complex?

Yes, if the function for velocity is complex and difficult to integrate analytically, numerical methods such as the trapezoidal rule or Simpson's rule can be used to approximate the integral of velocity squared over a specified interval.

5. What is the physical significance of integrating velocity squared?

Integrating velocity squared can be related to kinetic energy. Specifically, the integral of velocity squared over time can provide insights into the energy dynamics of a system, as kinetic energy is given by the formula KE = 0.5 * m * v², where m is mass and v is velocity.

Similar threads

Back
Top