Need help with an integral -- How to integrate velocity squared?

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem with an implicit function integral and the difficulties in solving it without knowing the initial function. The chain rule is mentioned as a potential solution, but it only works for systems with a first order ODE. It is suggested to approach the problem by considering the energy dissipation term.
  • #1
Tomder
4
1
TL;DR Summary
Problem with a implicit function integral.
The integral is this one:

##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt,##

With ##x=x(t). ##

I don't know how to solve that integral and I haven't find nothing to read about on how to proceed with this kind of (implicit function?) integrals without having the initial function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Tomder said:
TL;DR Summary: Problem with a implicit function integral.

The integral is this one:

##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt,##

With ##x=x(t). ##

I don't know how to solve that integral and I haven't find nothing to read about on how to proceed with this kind of (implicit function?) integrals without having the initial function.

By the chain rule: [tex]\int \dot x^2\,dt = \int \dot x \frac{dx}{dt}\,dt = \int \dot x \,dx.[/tex] But this only helps you if you know [itex]\dot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex], ie. your system satisfies a first order ODE. But you originally asked this question in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE [tex]
\ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x.[/tex] In that case you do not have [itex]\dot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex]; you have [itex]\ddot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]\dot x[/itex]. You can't evaluate[itex]\int \dot x^2 \,dt[/itex] unless you already know [itex]x(t)[/itex] and [itex]\dot x(t)[/itex]. What you can say is that [tex]
\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac12 \dot x^2 + \int f(x)\,dx \right) = -k\dot x^2 \leq 0,[/tex] ie. the system dissipates energy.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff, PeroK, Tomder and 1 other person
  • #4
pasmith said:
By the chain rule: [tex]\int \dot x^2\,dt = \int \dot x \frac{dx}{dt}\,dt = \int \dot x \,dx.[/tex] But this only helps you if you know [itex]\dot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex], ie. your system satisfies a first order ODE. But you originally asked this question in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE [tex]
\ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x.[/tex] In that case you do not have [itex]\dot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex]; you have [itex]\ddot x[/itex] in terms of [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]\dot x[/itex]. You can't evaluate[itex]\int \dot x^2 \,dt[/itex] unless you already know [itex]x(t)[/itex] and [itex]\dot x(t)[/itex]. What you can say is that [tex]
\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac12 \dot x^2 + \int f(x)\,dx \right) = -k\dot x^2 \leq 0,[/tex] ie. the system dissipates energy.
Thanks, I thought about the same process but was unsure of its veracity, guess I‘ll try to work in my system with the idea of energy dissipation term. Thank you very much for your answer.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK

Similar threads

  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
373
Replies
1
Views
203
  • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top