Need help with Quantinization of Charge concept and calculations

In summary, an oil drop with a mass of 3.30x10^-15kg and a velocity of 1.70m/s moves at a constant speed between two horizontal parallel plates that are 1.00cm apart and connected to a 6.75x10^2V battery. The electric force and the gravitational force are equal, and by solving for the electric field strength and using the discrete nature of electric charge, the number of excess electrons on the oil drop can be calculated to be approximately 2.
  • #1
AceInfinity
26
0

Homework Statement


An oil drop whose mass is 3.30x10-15kg moves at a constant speed of 1.70m/s upward between two horizontal parallel plates. The plates are 1.00cm apart and are connected to a 6.75x102V battery. If the oil drop is negative and the top plate is positive, calculate the number of excess electrons that the oil drop has.

Answer: 3

Homework Equations


Not sure, but I have a list of equations that we use, and i'd guess:
• delta V = (delta E)/(q)
• E = (delta V)/(delta d)
• E = Fe/q

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where to start.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If the velocity is constant, what does that say about the net force on the oil drop?
What forces are at play?
 
  • #3
constant velocity means no acceleration, and Fnet = 0? If you could provide me a short explanation of the foruma's you use and the steps to the final solution that would better help me I think, I need to figure this out by tomorrow, and I get the concepts somewhat, I just don't understand what some of the variables in the formulas mean and why you'd use them. I can figure things out better that way with my style of learning.

If you could tell me if I have the right idea by using... Fnet = Fe + Fg? And since Fnet = 0 then if it's just a magnitude then Fe = Fg?
 
  • #4
Yes, now answer gneill's second question. What forces are present in this problem (hint: gravity is one), and then you can try to balance forces.
 
  • #5
did you read my post correctly?

"Fnet = Fe + Fg ... Fe = Fg" I need help beyond that point.
 
  • #6
Presumably you know that the gravitational force will be the weight of the oil drop, or Fg = mass*g. It is interesting to note that g has units m/s2 which are entirely equivalent to the units N/kg. There's a similar expression for the force due to an electric field, Fe = q*E. Here E is the electric field strength in N/C or equivalently -- and this is important -- V/m.

Now, with the information given, can you think of a way to arrive at the magnitude of the electric field? Do you know anything about electric fields between charged plates?
 
  • #7
Alright, so from here:

Fg = Fe
Fg = qE

but you need to solve for E first so you'd use: E = v/m
E = 675V / 0.05m
E = 1.35x104

m x gravity = q x 1.35x104
(m x gravity) / 1.35x104 = q
q = 4.1555555...x10-19

instead of gravity though you'd use the 1.7m/s

Then the charge of an electron we divide into that (1.6x10-19)

4.155555.x10-19 / 1.6x10-19

= 2.5972...
Answer = 2

Btw, I forgot that the teacher changed the answer key, the answer is actually 2 because you can't round up since a decimal of an electron doesn't exist. I hope that was right.
 
  • #8
AceInfinity said:
Alright, so from here:

Fg = Fe
Fg = qE

but you need to solve for E first so you'd use: E = v/m
E = 675V / 0.05m
E = 1.35x104

Where did the 0.05m distance come from? Your problem statement claimed that the plate separation was 1.0cm.

m x gravity = q x 1.35x104
(m x gravity) / 1.35x104 = q
q = 4.1555555...x10-19

instead of gravity though you'd use the 1.7m/s

Huh? How can a velocity be interchanged with gravity?

Then the charge of an electron we divide into that (1.6x10-19)

4.155555.x10-19 / 1.6x10-19

= 2.5972...
Answer = 2

Btw, I forgot that the teacher changed the answer key, the answer is actually 2 because you can't round up since a decimal of an electron doesn't exist. I hope that was right.

Your result should be very close to an integer before rounding, any difference being attributable to experimental error, numerical truncation issues, or the use of inexact constants.
 
  • #9
I wasn't looking for criticism, I was looking for some help, or some steps in the right direction.

But from what you say... The electric field strengh would be equivilant to E = v/m, so then I would end up with (6.75x10^2V)/(3.30x10^-15Kg) = 2.0454545...x10^17 N/C...??
 
Last edited:
  • #10
AceInfinity said:
I wasn't looking for criticism, I was looking for some help, or some steps in the right direction.

But from what you say... The electric field strengh would be equivilant to E = v/m, so then I would end up with (6.75x10^2V)/(3.30x10^-15Kg) = 2.0454545...x10^17 N/C...??

The 'm' in E = V/m is the meter, a unit of length. The V is the volt. Electric field strength is measured in units of volts per meter, or Newtons per coulomb.

Once you have the electric field strength you can equate the electric force to the gravitational force (since there is no acceleration hence no net force on the oil drop).

Since electric charge comes in discrete lumps the size of the charge on the electron (let's call it qe here), then let the total charge on the oil drop be n*qe. Solve for n.
 
  • #11
E = V/m
= E = (6.75x102V)/(0.10m)

Therefore E = 6750N/C

E = N/C

Therefore N = E/C

N = (6750N/C)/(1.60x10-19C)
= 4.21875x1022
= ANS / 1.60x10-19 <--- to find out how many electrons there are by finding how many charges of one electron can fit into the oil drop's total charge.

= 2.63671... x1042

lol the answers agree with the final answer, all except for the exponents I believe. I'm not sure.
 
  • #12
AceInfinity said:
E = V/m
= E = (6.75x102V)/(0.10m)

Therefore E = 6750N/C

You're off by an order of magnitude. 1cm is not 0.1m

E = N/C

Therefore N = E/C

N = (6750N/C)/(1.60x10-19C)
= 4.21875x1022
= ANS / 1.60x10-19 <--- to find out how many electrons there are by finding how many charges of one electron can fit into the oil drop's total charge.

= 2.63671... x1042

lol the answers agree with the final answer, all except for the exponents I believe. I'm not sure.

No idea what you're calculating there. It looks as though you were going for a force (N), but why did you insert a charge? You don't know the charge yet.

You want to balance the electric force with the gravitational force. The unknown in that balance is the charge, which you want to solve for.
 
  • #13
E = V/m
E = (6.75x102V)/(0.01m)
E = 67500 N/C

Fg = Fe
m x ag = Eq
(3.30x10-15kg)(9.81m/s2) = (67500 N/C)(q)
q = [(3.30x10-15kg)(9.81m/s2)] / (67500 N/C)
q = 4.796x10-19

*Doing this as I type it out and that -19 looks promising...

4.796x10-19 / (1.60x10-19) = 2.9975

and we would round up to 3...

Thankyou!
 
  • #14
My pleasure. This last bit of figuring is short, crisp, and correct. Nicely done. :smile:
 

FAQ: Need help with Quantinization of Charge concept and calculations

What is the concept of quantization of charge?

The concept of quantization of charge states that the charge of any object is always a multiple of a fundamental unit of charge, which is the charge of a single electron or proton. This means that charge cannot exist in fractions or decimals, but only in whole numbers.

How is quantization of charge related to atomic structure?

The quantization of charge is related to atomic structure because the fundamental unit of charge is carried by electrons and protons, which are the subatomic particles that make up atoms. The charge of an atom is determined by the number of protons and electrons it contains, and this charge is always a multiple of the fundamental unit of charge.

How is quantization of charge calculated?

The quantization of charge is calculated by dividing the total charge of an object by the fundamental unit of charge. This will give the number of fundamental units of charge present in the object, which will be a whole number. For example, if an object has a charge of 6.4 x 10^-19 Coulombs, it can be calculated as (6.4 x 10^-19 C) / (1.6 x 10^-19 C) = 4 fundamental units of charge.

Why is quantization of charge important in physics?

Quantization of charge is important in physics because it helps us understand the fundamental nature of charge and its relationship to matter. It also explains the discrete energy levels of atoms, which are crucial in understanding the behavior of matter at the atomic and subatomic level.

Are there any exceptions to the concept of quantization of charge?

Yes, there are exceptions to the concept of quantization of charge. In certain quantum systems, such as quantum dots and quantum wires, the charge can be quantized in fractions of the fundamental unit due to the confinement of electrons in these systems. However, at the macroscopic level, the concept of quantization of charge holds true.

Similar threads

Back
Top