- #36
Antiphon
- 1,686
- 4
Cinderella has it right.
Energy in a tunneling problem going negative is the result of that particular
problem's boudnary conditions and reference energy levels. It does not mean
that the energy density surrounding the particle (or the majority of its wavefunction)
has become negative.
An open region of space with a true negative energy density would repel ordinary
matter and be "antigravitational". To form a very loose analogy to charge polarity,
negative energy density is the opposite gravitational "charge" as compared with
ordinary matter. (For staunch relativists who are offended by the concept of
gravitational "charge", a negative energy density will curve spacetime in the
opposite way that a positive energy density does.)
Energy in a tunneling problem going negative is the result of that particular
problem's boudnary conditions and reference energy levels. It does not mean
that the energy density surrounding the particle (or the majority of its wavefunction)
has become negative.
An open region of space with a true negative energy density would repel ordinary
matter and be "antigravitational". To form a very loose analogy to charge polarity,
negative energy density is the opposite gravitational "charge" as compared with
ordinary matter. (For staunch relativists who are offended by the concept of
gravitational "charge", a negative energy density will curve spacetime in the
opposite way that a positive energy density does.)