Does negative gravity play a role in the expansion of the universe?

michaeljmj
11
0
These questions shows my lack of understanding of the expanding universe specifically the Friedmann equation. Here is a quote from Brian Greene (The Fabric of the Cosmos, page 273): “The early universe provided an arena in which gravity exerted its repulsive side with a vengeance, driving every region of space away from every other with unrelenting ferocity.”
Relativity proves that gravity curves spacetime but isn’t space expanding different from space curvature? In other words, how does negative gravity exert a force on space?
If the universe stopped expanding, like in a “bounce” theory, would the expanse of space (containing the Higgs field and cosmological constant) contract as the density of mass and energy increased?
 
Space news on Phys.org
michaeljmj said:
Relativity proves that gravity curves spacetime

Yes, spacetime, not space.

michaeljmj said:
isn’t space expanding different from space curvature?

It can be--space can be expanding but still be flat--but it is not different from spacetime curvature--if space is expanding, spacetime is curved.

michaeljmj said:
how does negative gravity exert a force on space?

Space expanding due to "negative gravity" or "repulsive gravity" is not a "force on space". (This is one reason I don't like Greene's terminology here, since it invites that very misunderstanding.) It's just how the geometry of spacetime works out when you have a positive cosmological constant. There is no "force" since all the objects whose motion tells about the expansion of space are in free fall, feeling no force.
 
PeterDonis said:
Space expanding due to "negative gravity" or "repulsive gravity" is not a "force on space". (This is one reason I don't like Greene's terminology here, since it invites that very misunderstanding.) It's just how the geometry of spacetime works out when you have a positive cosmological constant. There is no "force" since all the objects whose motion tells about the expansion of space are in free fall, feeling no force.
Thanks for the specific answer. A follow-up question, in the inflationary theory, the inflaton field was similar to a positive cosmological constant only much stronger. Right?
 
michaeljmj said:
Thanks for the specific answer. A follow-up question, in the inflationary theory, the inflaton field was similar to a positive cosmological constant only much stronger. Right?
Yes. Of course it wasn't truly a constant, but certainly the energy density changed very slowly during the bulk of the inflationary expansion.
 
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top