- #36
GeorgeDishman
- 419
- 29
marcus said:Maybe I should mention that early universe observation (like Planck mission) is viewed as the main testing arena in other words a proving ground for Quantum Gravity.
This paper which came out a couple of days ago examples that.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.4989
Loop Quantum Gravity and the The Planck Regime of Cosmology
Abhay Ashtekar
(Submitted on 20 Mar 2013)
Interesting that he was one of the originators of LQG too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity#History
... In papers leading up to this one synonyms like "pre-inflationary era" have been used in place of "Planck regime".
I always assumed there had to be a gap since the horizon problem is supposedly solved by allowing inflation to expand a region which had reached thermodynamic equilibrium to larger than our horizon. That seems to imply a period before inflation started during which equilibrium could be achieved. "Planck regime" would then be a subset of "pre-inflationary era" with the former ending around 10^-43s and the latter starting around 10^-36s.
Thanks for bringing this up, LQG is something I hadn't look at before, it seems it's going to become more relevant as Planck is reaching the sensitivity where it might become testable.
From your previous message:
Note that the central values are, as usual, negative.
Yeah, by 0.08 sigma
Last edited: