- #36
TurtleMeister
- 896
- 98
jeffrey c mc. said:Turtlemeister;
I got finished with last post after your post #32. In another OP I was concerned about the usage of having two objects in, or described as occupying an one-dimensional construct. Is your description of describing the dynamics of just two objects and the characteristics of gravity dynamics, using such a principle?
I don't know what principle you're talking about. You may be able to answer the question yourself by googeling "two body problem".
jeffrey c mc. said:Also, is it not so that a violation of a natural law can happen, yet, if it does, it produces an anomaly, as phenomena.
I think you meant "law of nature, or physical law" instead of "natural law". No, I've never heard of anything like that. The conservation of momentum, which I referred to in my post, is one of the most fundamental concepts of physics. There has never been an observation of it being violated. In other words, you can bet the farm on it.
Buckleymanor, you should try to fix your quotes before the edit time runs out. Make sure each quote has the "QUOTE=TurtleMeister;4375163" at the beginning and the "/QUOTE" at the end.
Buckleymanor said:When you say the acceleration of Earth 1 would increase I can't see how the acceleration would be very very small if you introduced an Earth 2.
You are correct. Disregard the last sentence. I forgot that we were changing the mass of the bowling ball to the mass of earth. That's quite a change in mass. :)
Buckleymanor said:You say that it doesn't matter what the masses (sizes) are.If you increased the mass of Earth 2 beyond the size of the Earth then won't Earth 1 accelerate at a speed greater than Earth 2 towards it?
ie,more than9.8 mtrs/sec.
Yes, that is correct. What I meant by saying "it doesn't matter what the masses are" is that it makes no difference as far as the UFF is concerned. You stated in a previous post; "When things are scaled up don't they get stranger". What I'm saying is, no they don't. It's still physics as usual.