NextNano3 simulation and some physics help

In summary: It would be helpful to have more information about the specific simulation being done to determine which type of contact would be best. In summary, the program nextnano3 allows for simulations of nanowires and other structures. A user has created an InP nanowire with gates at the bottom and is manipulating the doping to control the Fermi level and conduction band energy levels. They have a question about the difference between ohmic contacts and Schottky barriers and which would be better for creating a gated dot within the nanowire. Ohmic contacts have no energy barrier while Schottky barriers have a barrier height that can be altered by the work function of the metal used. In this case, an ohmic contact may be preferable for easier
  • #1
ingeni
1
0
hi there,

Im currently working with the program nextnano3. It's a really nice program with which you can simulate nanowires, dots etc.

I currently made a sample of an InP nanowire, with 3 sided gates at the bottom of the wire. These don't touch the wire (10nm between them and the wire) on which i can apply a voltage. The electric field coming of them let's me 'pull' wells in the cond- and valence bands. In these wells, electrons can get 'stuck'. Now I am changing the doping on the wire so that the fermi level and conductionband energy difference becomes smaller.
I actually want the fermi level to lie within the well. If this happens, it actually indicates that the electrons can get stuck in the well.

Now a question: the program let's met apply different kinds of boundary conditions. An ohmic contact or a shottky barrier. This means that the contact between the metal gates and the SiO2 (between the gate and the wire) is one of the contacts i mentioned above.
Now i would like to know what the difference is between these contacts, and if anyone knows which contacts are preferred for making a gated dot within the nanowire.
The program only let's me apply a voltage to ohmic contacts, but with shottky barriers i van also tell the program what the barrier height is.

Does anyone have any experience with this, and maybe explain to me the difference between and ohmic contact and a shottky barrier.

if it isn't clear, ill gladly explain some more.

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
!The main difference between an ohmic contact and a Schottky barrier is that the Schottky barrier has a potential barrier height which must be overcome before electrons can flow through. This barrier height is determined by the work function of the metal used in the contact and the Fermi level of the semiconductor material. An ohmic contact, on the other hand, does not have an energy barrier and so electrons can flow through it easily. In terms of making a gated dot within a nanowire, an ohmic contact is generally preferred since it allows for an easier way to apply a voltage and control the conduction band energy levels. However, if you need to control the barrier height then a Schottky barrier may be better since you can adjust the work function of the metal contact to vary the barrier height.
 
  • #3


I am familiar with the NextNano3 simulation program and its applications in simulating nanowires and dots. It is definitely a useful tool in studying these nanostructures and their properties.

Regarding your sample of an InP nanowire with 3-sided gates, it is interesting to see how the electric field from these gates can manipulate the condensation and valence bands to create wells where electrons can get "stuck". By changing the doping on the wire, you are able to adjust the Fermi level and conduction band energy difference, potentially allowing for electrons to get trapped in the well.

In terms of the different boundary conditions, an ohmic contact allows for a low resistance connection between the metal gates and the SiO2 layer, while a Schottky barrier creates a potential barrier between the two materials. The choice between these two contacts will depend on the specific properties and goals of your simulation. If you are trying to create a gated dot within the nanowire, it may be more beneficial to use the Schottky barrier as it allows for control over the barrier height and can potentially create a more confined dot.

I hope this helps to clarify the difference between an ohmic contact and a Schottky barrier and their potential uses in your simulation. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Good luck with your research!
 

FAQ: NextNano3 simulation and some physics help

What is NextNano3 simulation and how does it work?

NextNano3 simulation is a computer program that allows researchers to model and simulate the behavior of nanostructures, such as quantum dots, nanowires, and nanotubes. It uses quantum mechanics equations and algorithms to predict the electronic, optical, and transport properties of these structures.

What are the advantages of using NextNano3 simulation in research?

NextNano3 simulation offers several advantages, including the ability to quickly and accurately predict the properties of nanostructures without the need for expensive and time-consuming experiments. It also allows for the exploration of a wide range of parameters and conditions that may not be feasible in a laboratory setting.

What kind of physics does NextNano3 simulation involve?

NextNano3 simulation involves several areas of physics, including quantum mechanics, solid state physics, and statistical mechanics. It also incorporates computational methods and algorithms to solve complex equations and simulate the behavior of nanoscale systems.

Can NextNano3 simulation be used for any type of nanostructure?

NextNano3 simulation is a versatile tool that can be used for various types of nanostructures, including quantum dots, nanowires, and nanotubes. It can also be adapted for different materials and environmental conditions, making it a valuable tool for researchers in different fields.

How accurate are the predictions made by NextNano3 simulation?

The accuracy of NextNano3 simulation depends on the quality of the input parameters and the complexity of the system being simulated. In general, it can provide accurate predictions of electronic, optical, and transport properties within a certain range of conditions. However, it is always recommended to validate the results with experimental data.

Back
Top