MHB Nick's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a volume by slicing

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a solid with a triangular base defined by the line x + y = 9 and the axes, with semicircular cross sections perpendicular to the y-axis. The radius of the semicircle is derived from the x-coordinate, leading to the volume of an arbitrary slice expressed as dV = πr² dy. The total volume is computed using integration, resulting in V = (π/12)(9^3) = 243π/4. The solution involves substitution and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to evaluate the integral. The final volume of the solid is confirmed as 243π/4.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Finding volume of a solid (calculus)?

Find the volume of the solid with the given base and cross sections.

The base is the triangle enclosed by x + y = 9,
the x-axis, and the y-axis. The cross sections perpendicular to the y-axis are semicircles.

Thanks in advance.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Nick,

For any slice of the solid made perpendicular to the $y$-axis, the diameter of the semi-circle is the $x$-coordinate on the line $x+y=9$, and so the radius is:

$$r=\frac{x}{2}=\frac{9-y}{2}$$

And so the volume of an arbitrary slice is:

$$dV=\pi r^2\,dy=\frac{\pi}{4}(9-y)^2\,dy$$

Hence, the summation of all the slices is given by:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{4}\int_0^9 (9-y)^2\,dy$$

Using the substitution:

$$u=9-y\,\therefore\,du=-dy$$ we obtain:

$$V=-\frac{\pi}{4}\int_9^0 u^2\,dy$$

Using the rule:

$$-\int_a^b f(x)\,dx=\int_b^a f(x)\,dx$$ we may write:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{4}\int_0^9 u^2\,dy$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{12}\left[u^3 \right]_0^9=\frac{9^3\pi}{12}=\frac{243\pi}{4}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top